Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LTRX vs CALX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
LTRX vs CALX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $269M | $2.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $117M | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 42.3% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.9% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 40.4x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $26M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $143M |
LTRX vs CALX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) | 100 | 187.5 | +87.5% |
| Calix, Inc. (CALX) | 100 | 314.5 | +214.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LTRX vs CALX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LTRX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +214.9% vs CALX's +5.9%
CALX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs LTRX's 499.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs LTRX's -23.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.0x vs 40.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs LTRX's -7.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs LTRX's 2.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +214.9% vs CALX's +5.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs LTRX's -7.5%, ROIC 2.1% vs -10.5% |
LTRX vs CALX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LTRX vs CALX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CALX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CALX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 9.1x LTRX's $117M. CALX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LTRX's -7.9%. On growth, CALX holds the edge at +27.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $117M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $109M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.3% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +10.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | +27.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.1% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LTRX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $269M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $270M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.34x | 170.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.42x | 24.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 70.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.19x | 2.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.51x | 3.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.63x | 24.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CALX leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CALX delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-12 for LTRX. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LTRX's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CALX scores 6/9 vs LTRX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.4% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.5% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.5% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.0% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $143M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $26M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.74x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LTRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LTRX five years ago would be worth $12,068 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,570 for CALX. Over the past 12 months, LTRX leads with a +214.9% total return vs CALX's +5.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LTRX at 22.9% vs CALX's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.1% | -17.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +214.9% | +5.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.5% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.7% | -4.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +499.1% | +534.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.9% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LTRX and CALX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CALX is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LTRX's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LTRX currently trades 82.2% from its 52-week high vs CALX's 62.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.24 | $71.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.03 | $40.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.2% | +62.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.1 | 47.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 581K | 937K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LTRX as "Buy" and CALX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.6% upside for CALX (target: $61) vs 30.4% for LTRX (target: $9).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.83 | $61.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
CALX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LTRX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
LTRX vs CALX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LTRX or CALX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 3% for Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX). Calix, Inc. (CALX) offers the better valuation at 170. 5x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LTRX or CALX?
On forward P/E, Calix, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 25. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LTRX or CALX?
Over the past 5 years, Lantronix, Inc.
(LTRX) delivered a total return of +20. 7%, compared to -4. 3% for Calix, Inc. (CALX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALX returned +534. 3% versus LTRX's +499. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LTRX or CALX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Lantronix, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning LTRX is approximately 118% more volatile than CALX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 28% for Lantronix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LTRX or CALX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus -23. 3% for Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -141. 7% for Lantronix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CALX leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LTRX or CALX?
Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 8% net margin versus -9. 3% for Lantronix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CALX leads at 2. 1% versus -8. 9% for LTRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CALX leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LTRX or CALX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 40. 4x for Lantronix, Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CALX: 37. 6% to $61. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LTRX or CALX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LTRX or CALX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +534. 3% 10Y return). Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CALX: +534. 3%, LTRX: +499. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LTRX and CALX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LTRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.