Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LUCD vs GKOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
LUCD vs GKOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $137M | $7.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $551M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10.44B | $-189M |
| Gross Margin | -40.2% | 78.1% |
| Operating Margin | -9.7% | -15.6% |
| Total Debt | $21M | $140M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $91M |
LUCD vs GKOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucid Diagnostics I… (LUCD) | 100 | 10.5 | -89.5% |
| Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) | 100 | 293.5 | +193.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LUCD vs GKOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LUCD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.74
- Rev growth 79.0%, EPS growth 16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 105.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 1.07x
GKOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 457.1% 10Y total return vs LUCD's -91.1%
- -34.3% margin vs LUCD's -8.6%
- +52.0% vs LUCD's -11.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 79.0% revenue growth vs GKOS's 32.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -34.3% margin vs LUCD's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs GKOS's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.0% vs LUCD's -11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -20.1% ROA vs LUCD's -196.2% |
LUCD vs GKOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LUCD vs GKOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GKOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GKOS is the larger business by revenue, generating $551M annually — 129.7x LUCD's $4M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -34.3% (GKOS) to -8.6% (LUCD). On growth, LUCD holds the edge at +1032.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $551M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11.4B | -$40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10.4B | -$189M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$44M | -$18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | +78.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.7% | -15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | -34.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -3.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1032.3% | +41.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.0% | -6.3% |
Valuation Metrics
GKOS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $137M | $7.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $136M | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.00x | -40.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.63x | 15.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.84x | 11.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GKOS leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GKOS delivers a -26.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-26 in annual profit, vs $-404 for LUCD. GKOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LUCD's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LUCD scores 5/9 vs GKOS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -404.1% | -26.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -196.2% | -20.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.1% | -10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.94x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $49M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $91M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $140M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5162.15x | -18.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GKOS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GKOS five years ago would be worth $16,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $893 for LUCD. Over the past 12 months, GKOS leads with a +52.0% total return vs LUCD's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GKOS at 31.7% vs LUCD's -12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.3% | +21.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.8% | +52.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.0% | +128.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.1% | +61.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.1% | +457.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.9% | +31.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LUCD and GKOS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LUCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GKOS's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GKOS currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs LUCD's 61.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.70 | $146.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.95 | $73.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.8% | +91.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 63.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 723K | 678K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LUCD as "Buy" and GKOS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 138.1% upside for LUCD (target: $3) vs 9.3% for GKOS (target: $147).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.50 | $146.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GKOS leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
LUCD vs GKOS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LUCD or GKOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lucid Diagnostics Inc.
(LUCD) is the stronger pick with 79. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 32. 3% for Glaukos Corporation (GKOS). Analysts rate Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (LUCD) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LUCD or GKOS?
Over the past 5 years, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) delivered a total return of +61.
5%, compared to -91. 1% for Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (LUCD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GKOS returned +457. 1% versus LUCD's -91. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LUCD or GKOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lucid Diagnostics Inc.
(LUCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Glaukos Corporation's 1. 20β — meaning GKOS is approximately 62% more volatile than LUCD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 4% for Lucid Diagnostics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LUCD or GKOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lucid Diagnostics Inc.
(LUCD) is pulling ahead at 79. 0% versus 32. 3% for Glaukos Corporation (GKOS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lucid Diagnostics Inc. grew EPS 16. 7% year-over-year, compared to -18. 4% for Glaukos Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LUCD leads at 105. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LUCD or GKOS?
Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the more profitable company, earning -37.
0% net margin versus -1047. 6% for Lucid Diagnostics Inc. — meaning it keeps -37. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GKOS leads at -17. 1% versus -1059. 6% for LUCD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GKOS leads at 77. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LUCD or GKOS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LUCD or GKOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lucid Diagnostics Inc.
(LUCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LUCD: -91. 1%, GKOS: +457. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LUCD and GKOS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.