Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LUCD vs GKOS vs NVCR vs EW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
LUCD vs GKOS vs NVCR vs EW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $137M | $7.85B | $1.92B | $47.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $551M | $674M | $6.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10.44B | $-189M | $-173M | $1.07B |
| Gross Margin | -40.2% | 78.1% | 75.2% | 78.1% |
| Operating Margin | -9.7% | -15.6% | -27.2% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 26.6x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $140M | $290M | $705M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $91M | $103M | $2.94B |
LUCD vs GKOS vs NVCR vs EW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucid Diagnostics I… (LUCD) | 100 | 10.3 | -89.7% |
| Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) | 100 | 292.1 | +192.1% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 17.4 | -82.6% |
| Edwards Lifescience… (EW) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LUCD vs GKOS vs NVCR vs EW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LUCD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 79.0%, EPS growth 16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 105.6%
- 79.0% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3%
GKOS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 457.1% 10Y total return vs EW's 133.4%
- +52.0% vs LUCD's -11.8%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.65
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 6.8%, current ratio 3.72x
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 3.72x
- 17.6% margin vs LUCD's -8.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 79.0% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs LUCD's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.0% vs LUCD's -11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs LUCD's -196.2% |
LUCD vs GKOS vs NVCR vs EW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LUCD vs GKOS vs NVCR vs EW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EW leads in 3 of 6 categories
GKOS leads 1 • LUCD leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EW is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 1427.4x LUCD's $4M. EW is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUCD's -8.6%. On growth, LUCD holds the edge at +1032.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $551M | $674M | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11.4B | -$40M | -$165M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10.4B | -$189M | -$173M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$44M | -$18M | -$48M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | +78.1% | +75.2% | +78.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.7% | -15.6% | -27.2% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | -34.3% | -25.7% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -3.4% | -7.1% | +22.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1032.3% | +41.2% | +12.3% | +13.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.0% | -6.3% | -100.0% | -75.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GKOS and NVCR and EW each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $137M | $7.9B | $1.9B | $47.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $136M | $7.9B | $2.1B | $45.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.00x | -40.90x | -13.80x | 45.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 26.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 6.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 25.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.63x | 15.47x | 2.92x | 7.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.84x | 11.69x | 5.51x | 4.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 35.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EW delivers a 10.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-404 for LUCD. EW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LUCD's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EW scores 6/9 vs GKOS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -404.1% | -26.5% | -50.8% | +10.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -196.2% | -20.1% | -16.5% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -9.2% | -16.4% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.1% | -10.3% | -28.9% | +14.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.94x | 0.21x | 0.85x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $49M | $187M | -$2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $91M | $103M | $2.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $140M | $290M | $705M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5162.15x | -18.69x | -96.80x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GKOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GKOS five years ago would be worth $16,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, GKOS leads with a +52.0% total return vs LUCD's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GKOS at 31.7% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.3% | +21.2% | +28.3% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.8% | +52.0% | +1.1% | +10.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.0% | +128.7% | -75.7% | -7.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.1% | +61.5% | -91.3% | -10.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.1% | +457.1% | +30.3% | +133.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.9% | +31.7% | -37.6% | -2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
EW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EW is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EW currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs LUCD's 61.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 1.16x | 2.15x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.70 | $146.75 | $20.06 | $87.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.95 | $73.16 | $9.82 | $72.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.8% | +91.4% | +83.9% | +94.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 63.0 | 69.8 | 54.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 723K | 678K | 1.5M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LUCD as "Buy", GKOS as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", EW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 138.1% upside for LUCD (target: $3) vs 9.3% for GKOS (target: $147).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.50 | $146.67 | $33.50 | $97.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 24 | 15 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.9% |
EW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GKOS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
LUCD vs GKOS vs NVCR vs EW: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LUCD or GKOS or NVCR or EW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lucid Diagnostics Inc.
(LUCD) is the stronger pick with 79. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) offers the better valuation at 45. 2x trailing P/E (26. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (LUCD) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LUCD or GKOS or NVCR or EW?
Over the past 5 years, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) delivered a total return of +61.
5%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GKOS returned +454. 5% versus LUCD's -91. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LUCD or GKOS or NVCR or EW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
64β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 237% more volatile than EW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 4% for Lucid Diagnostics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LUCD or GKOS or NVCR or EW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lucid Diagnostics Inc.
(LUCD) is pulling ahead at 79. 0% versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NovoCure Limited grew EPS 21. 8% year-over-year, compared to -73. 7% for Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LUCD leads at 105. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LUCD or GKOS or NVCR or EW?
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
7% net margin versus -1047. 6% for Lucid Diagnostics Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EW leads at 27. 0% versus -1059. 6% for LUCD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EW leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LUCD or GKOS or NVCR or EW more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LUCD: 138.
1% to $2. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — LUCD or GKOS or NVCR or EW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is LUCD or GKOS or NVCR or EW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), +125. 5% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EW: +125. 5%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LUCD and GKOS and NVCR and EW?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LUCD is a small-cap high-growth stock; GKOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.