Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MAZE vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MAZE vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $2.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | -83.9% |
| Total Debt | $23M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $434M |
MAZE vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maze Therapeutics, … (MAZE) | 100 | 151.0 | +51.0% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 55.7 | -44.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAZE vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAZE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.13
- 51.0% 10Y total return vs RARE's -60.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 6.6%, current ratio 15.50x
RARE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 20.1% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0%
- -91.0% margin vs MAZE's -6.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -91.0% margin vs MAZE's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs RARE's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.5% vs RARE's -36.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -31.8% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC -99.4% vs -89.4% |
MAZE vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MAZE vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE is the larger business by revenue, generating $669M annually — 33.5x MAZE's $20M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -91.0% (RARE) to -6.1% (MAZE).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$122M | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.9% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MAZE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.90x | -4.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.92x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAZE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAZE delivers a -36.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-37 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.6% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.8% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -99.4% | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.1% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$166M | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.24x | -14.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAZE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAZE five years ago would be worth $15,103 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,358 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, MAZE leads with a +88.5% total return vs RARE's -36.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAZE at 14.7% vs RARE's -22.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.4% | +1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.5% | -36.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.0% | -53.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.0% | -76.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.0% | -60.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | -22.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MAZE and RARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAZE is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RARE currently trades 56.6% from its 52-week high vs MAZE's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.65 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.83 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.9% | +56.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.0 | 47.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 646K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MAZE as "Buy" and RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 162.6% upside for MAZE (target: $63) vs 101.7% for RARE (target: $48).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.25 | $48.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MAZE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). RARE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
MAZE vs RARE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAZE or RARE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). Analysts rate Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MAZE or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, Maze Therapeutics, Inc.
(MAZE) delivered a total return of +51. 0%, compared to -76. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAZE returned +51. 0% versus RARE's -60. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MAZE or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Maze Therapeutics, Inc.
(MAZE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning RARE is approximately 30% more volatile than MAZE relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MAZE or RARE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. grew EPS 7. 3% year-over-year, compared to -40. 2% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MAZE or RARE?
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is the more profitable company, earning -85. 4% net margin versus -612. 7% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps -85. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RARE leads at -79. 5% versus -670. 3% for MAZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAZE leads at 92. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MAZE or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MAZE or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Maze Therapeutics, Inc.
(MAZE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAZE: +51. 0%, RARE: -60. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MAZE and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MAZE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.