Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MCB logo
MCB
FFIC logo
FFIC
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MCB vs FFIC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MCB
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.01B
5Y Perf.+201.2%
FFIC
Flushing Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$524M
5Y Perf.+38.6%

MCB vs FFIC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MCB logoMCB
FFIC logoFFIC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$1.01B$524M
Revenue (TTM)$527M$489M
Net Income (TTM)$71M$19M
Gross Margin52.6%46.2%
Operating Margin19.3%7.1%
Forward P/E9.3x11.0x
Total Debt$81M$592M
Cash & Equiv.$394M$126M

MCB vs FFICLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MCB
FFIC
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Metropolitan Bank H… (MCB)100301.2+201.2%
Flushing Financial … (FFIC)100138.6+38.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MCB vs FFIC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MCB leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Flushing Financial Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇MCB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MCB
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
The Banking Pick

MCB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 0.3%
  • 161.7% 10Y total return vs FFIC's 16.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 10.9%, current ratio 109.88x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
FFIC
Flushing Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

FFIC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth 151.4%
  • 11.1% NII/revenue growth vs MCB's 7.1%
  • 5.7% yield, vs MCB's 0.3%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFFIC logoFFIC11.1% NII/revenue growth vs MCB's 7.1%
ValueMCB logoMCBLower P/E (9.3x vs 11.0x)
Quality / MarginsMCB logoMCBEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs FFIC's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyMCB logoMCBBeta 0.96 vs FFIC's 1.01, lower leverage
DividendsFFIC logoFFIC5.7% yield, vs MCB's 0.3%
Momentum (1Y)MCB logoMCB+47.6% vs FFIC's +34.9%
Efficiency (ROA)MCB logoMCBEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs FFIC's 0.3%

MCB vs FFIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MCBMetropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
75.9%$8M
Financial Service, Other
24.1%$3M
FFICFlushing Financial Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

MCB vs FFIC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMCBLAGGINGFFIC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MCB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

MCB and FFIC operate at a comparable scale, with $527M and $489M in trailing revenue. MCB is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FFIC's 3.9%.

MetricMCB logoMCBMetropolitan Bank…FFIC logoFFICFlushing Financia…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$527M$489M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$95M$40M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$71M$19M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$82M$56M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+52.6%+46.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.3%+7.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.5%+3.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.6%+11.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+47.3%+107.5%
MCB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MCB and FFIC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.6x trailing earnings, MCB trades at a 49% valuation discount to FFIC's 28.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MCB's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FFIC's 24.8x.

MetricMCB logoMCBMetropolitan Bank…FFIC logoFFICFlushing Financia…
Market CapShares × price$1.0B$524M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$694M$990M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.60x28.65x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.29x10.97x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.01x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.84x24.85x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.91x1.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.40x0.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.21x9.39x
Evenly matched — MCB and FFIC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MCB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

MCB delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for FFIC. MCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FFIC's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIC scores 8/9 vs MCB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMCB logoMCBMetropolitan Bank…FFIC logoFFICFlushing Financia…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.7%+2.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.6%+1.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.1%+0.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.84x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$362M$466M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$394M$126M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$81M$592M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.48x0.14x
MCB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MCB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MCB five years ago would be worth $15,292 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,047 for FFIC. Over the past 12 months, MCB leads with a +47.6% total return vs FFIC's +34.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCB at 39.8% vs FFIC's 7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMCB logoMCBMetropolitan Bank…FFIC logoFFICFlushing Financia…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+26.1%+5.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+47.6%+34.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+173.2%+25.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.9%-9.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+161.7%+16.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+39.8%+7.7%
MCB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MCB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MCB is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIC's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCB currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs FFIC's 87.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMCB logoMCBMetropolitan Bank…FFIC logoFFICFlushing Financia…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.96x1.01x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$97.84$17.79
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$63.81$11.13
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.8%+87.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.042.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded126K262K
MCB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MCB and FFIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates MCB as "Buy" and FFIC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.3% upside for FFIC (target: $17) vs 0.4% for MCB (target: $97). For income investors, FFIC offers the higher dividend yield at 5.68% vs MCB's 0.30%.

MetricMCB logoMCBMetropolitan Bank…FFIC logoFFICFlushing Financia…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$97.00$16.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts410
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+5.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.29$0.88
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.3%+0.1%
Evenly matched — MCB and FFIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MCB leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallMetropolitan Bank Holding C… (MCB)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MCB vs FFIC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MCB or FFIC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) is the stronger pick with 11.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB). Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MCB or FFIC?

On trailing P/E, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.

(MCB) is the cheapest at 14. 6x versus Flushing Financial Corporation at 28. 6x. On forward P/E, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MCB or FFIC?

Over the past 5 years, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.

(MCB) delivered a total return of +52. 9%, compared to -9. 5% for Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCB returned +161. 7% versus FFIC's +16. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MCB or FFIC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.

(MCB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus Flushing Financial Corporation's 1. 01β — meaning FFIC is approximately 5% more volatile than MCB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 84% for Flushing Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MCB or FFIC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) is pulling ahead at 11.

1% versus 7. 1% for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flushing Financial Corporation grew EPS 151. 4% year-over-year, compared to 11. 6% for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MCB or FFIC?

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.

(MCB) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus 4. 2% for Flushing Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCB leads at 19. 3% versus 7. 6% for FFIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCB leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MCB or FFIC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.

(MCB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 11. 0x for Flushing Financial Corporation — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIC: 8. 3% to $16. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MCB or FFIC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 0. 3% for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB).

09

Is MCB or FFIC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

01), 5. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FFIC: +16. 6%, MCB: +161. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MCB and FFIC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. FFIC pays a dividend while MCB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.