Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MDGL vs ELVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MDGL vs ELVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $12.38B | $2.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.13B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-309M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 93.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | — |
| Total Debt | $354M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $199M | $99M |
MDGL vs ELVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madrigal Pharmaceut… (MDGL) | 100 | 465.2 | +365.2% |
| Enliven Therapeutic… (ELVN) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDGL vs ELVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MDGL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57
- Rev growth 432.1%, EPS growth 41.3%
- 37.6% 10Y total return vs ELVN's -31.3%
ELVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 3.4% margin vs MDGL's -27.3%
- +109.2% vs MDGL's +82.9%
- -23.4% ROA vs MDGL's -25.4%, ROIC -32.8% vs -29.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 432.1% revenue growth vs ELVN's -16.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.4% margin vs MDGL's -27.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs ELVN's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +109.2% vs MDGL's +82.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -23.4% ROA vs MDGL's -25.4%, ROIC -32.8% vs -29.4% |
MDGL vs ELVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MDGL vs ELVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ELVN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDGL and ELVN operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$312M | -$119M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$309M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$272M | -$70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MDGL and ELVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.4B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.5B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -42.00x | -22.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.92x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.09x | 5.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ELVN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ELVN delivers a -24.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-24 in annual profit, vs $-50 for MDGL.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.2% | -24.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.4% | -23.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.4% | -32.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.9% | -31.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $156M | -$99M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $199M | $99M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $354M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.51x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDGL five years ago would be worth $42,596 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,487 for ELVN. Over the past 12 months, ELVN leads with a +109.2% total return vs MDGL's +82.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELVN at 29.1% vs MDGL's 20.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.1% | +165.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.9% | +109.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.7% | +115.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +326.0% | +44.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3755.2% | -31.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.4% | +29.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MDGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELVN's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $615.00 | $48.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $265.00 | $14.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.8% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 312K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MDGL as "Buy" and ELVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.7% upside for MDGL (target: $706) vs 5.2% for ELVN (target: $43).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $705.67 | $43.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
ELVN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MDGL leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
MDGL vs ELVN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDGL or ELVN a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MDGL or ELVN?
Over the past 5 years, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) delivered a total return of +326. 0%, compared to +44. 9% for Enliven Therapeutics, Inc. (ELVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDGL returned +37. 6% versus ELVN's -31. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MDGL or ELVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Enliven Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning ELVN is approximately 125% more volatile than MDGL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MDGL or ELVN?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 41. 3% year-over-year, compared to 3. 2% for Enliven Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MDGL or ELVN?
Enliven Therapeutics, Inc.
(ELVN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -30. 1% for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ELVN leads at 0. 0% versus -31. 3% for MDGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDGL leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MDGL or ELVN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MDGL or ELVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDGL: +37. 6%, ELVN: -31. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MDGL and ELVN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MDGL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ELVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.