Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MHUA vs XTLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MHUA vs XTLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2M | $294K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $184M | $451K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $-1M |
| Gross Margin | 33.6% | 26.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | -481.6% |
| Forward P/E | 0.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $8M | $138K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $371K |
MHUA vs XTLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meihua Internationa… (MHUA) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| XTL Biopharmaceutic… (XTLB) | 100 | 32.0 | -68.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MHUA vs XTLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MHUA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- -0.2% revenue growth vs XTLB's -173.2%
- 10.1% margin vs XTLB's -227.7%
- 9.7% ROA vs XTLB's -17.7%, ROIC 7.4% vs -54.1%
XTLB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.71
- EPS growth 45.5%
- -87.3% 10Y total return vs MHUA's -99.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.2% revenue growth vs XTLB's -173.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs XTLB's -227.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.71 vs MHUA's 2.86, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -50.9% vs MHUA's -73.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs XTLB's -17.7%, ROIC 7.4% vs -54.1% |
MHUA vs XTLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MHUA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MHUA is the larger business by revenue, generating $184M annually — 407.5x XTLB's $451,000. MHUA is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XTLB's -2.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $184M | $451,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | -$1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +26.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | -4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | -3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.8% | +20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MHUA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $293,767 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$6M | $60,767 |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.19x | -0.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.40x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.14x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MHUA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MHUA delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-26 for XTLB. XTLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MHUA's 0.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MHUA scores 4/9 vs XTLB's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | -25.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.7% | -17.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | -54.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | -50.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$233,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $371,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $138,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 31.87x | -13.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XTLB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XTLB five years ago would be worth $1,963 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $59 for MHUA. Over the past 12 months, XTLB leads with a -50.9% total return vs MHUA's -73.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XTLB at -18.4% vs MHUA's -71.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +271.2% | +11.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.6% | -50.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -45.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -80.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -87.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.3% | -18.4% |
Risk & Volatility
XTLB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XTLB is the less volatile stock with a 1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MHUA's 2.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XTLB currently trades 26.0% from its 52-week high vs MHUA's 11.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.86x | 1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.00 | $10.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.05 | $1.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.9% | +26.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.6% | 0.0% |
MHUA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XTLB leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
MHUA vs XTLB: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MHUA or XTLB a better buy right now?
Meihua International Medical Technologies Co.
, Ltd. (MHUA) offers the better valuation at 0. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MHUA or XTLB?
Over the past 5 years, XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.
(XTLB) delivered a total return of -80. 4%, compared to -99. 4% for Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd. (MHUA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XTLB returned -87. 3% versus MHUA's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MHUA or XTLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.
(XTLB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 71β versus Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd. 's 2. 86β — meaning MHUA is approximately 68% more volatile than XTLB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (XTLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — MHUA or XTLB?
Meihua International Medical Technologies Co.
, Ltd. (MHUA) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 2% net margin versus -227. 7% for XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. — meaning it keeps 11. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MHUA leads at 14. 8% versus -481. 6% for XTLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MHUA leads at 34. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — MHUA or XTLB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is MHUA or XTLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.
(XTLB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd. (MHUA) carries a higher beta of 2. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XTLB: -87. 3%, MHUA: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between MHUA and XTLB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MHUA is a small-cap deep-value stock; XTLB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.