Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MIR vs ATEC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
MIR vs ATEC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $4.83B | $1.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $981M | $595M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $-125M |
| Gross Margin | 47.1% | 89.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | -9.6% |
| Forward P/E | 36.2x | 27.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.26B | $620M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $412M | $161M |
MIR vs ATEC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mirion Technologies… (MIR) | 100 | 197.5 | +97.5% |
| Alphatec Holdings, … (ATEC) | 100 | 129.4 | +29.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MIR vs ATEC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MIR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.98, Low D/E 65.8%, current ratio 2.84x
- 2.6% margin vs ATEC's -21.1%
- +22.7% vs ATEC's -37.8%
ATEC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.13
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth 15.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.6%
- 225.4% 10Y total return vs MIR's 98.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% revenue growth vs MIR's 7.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.1x vs 36.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs ATEC's -21.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs MIR's 1.98 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.7% vs ATEC's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.8% ROA vs ATEC's -15.8%, ROIC 1.6% vs -12.6% |
MIR vs ATEC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MIR vs ATEC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MIR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MIR is the larger business by revenue, generating $981M annually — 1.6x ATEC's $595M. MIR is the more profitable business, keeping 2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATEC's -21.1%. On growth, MIR holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $981M | $595M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $192M | $4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | -$125M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $90M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.1% | +89.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | -9.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +1.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.5% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +37.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MIR and ATEC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MIR's 29.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATEC's 3752.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 179.55x | -8.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 36.17x | 27.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.95x | 3752.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.22x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.69x | 32.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 45.15x | 422.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MIR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MIR delivers a 1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ATEC. MIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATEC's 17.21x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | -4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | -15.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | -12.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | -13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 17.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $848M | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $412M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $620M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.48x | -3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MIR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MIR five years ago would be worth $19,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,129 for ATEC. Over the past 12 months, MIR leads with a +22.7% total return vs ATEC's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MIR at 33.1% vs ATEC's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.1% | -62.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.7% | -37.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.7% | -47.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.4% | -48.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.5% | +225.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.1% | -19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MIR and ATEC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATEC is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MIR's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MIR currently trades 65.2% from its 52-week high vs ATEC's 33.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.28 | $23.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.98 | $6.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.2% | +33.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.8 | 26.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MIR as "Buy" and ATEC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 222.6% upside for ATEC (target: $25) vs 44.3% for MIR (target: $29).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.50 | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% |
MIR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
MIR vs ATEC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MIR or ATEC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
(ATEC) is the stronger pick with 25. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 5% for Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR). Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR) offers the better valuation at 179. 5x trailing P/E (36. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MIR or ATEC?
On forward P/E, Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 27. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MIR or ATEC?
Over the past 5 years, Mirion Technologies, Inc.
(MIR) delivered a total return of +93. 4%, compared to -48. 7% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATEC returned +225. 4% versus MIR's +98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MIR or ATEC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
(ATEC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus Mirion Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 98β — meaning MIR is approximately 76% more volatile than ATEC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 17% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MIR or ATEC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
(ATEC) is pulling ahead at 25. 0% versus 7. 5% for Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mirion Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 161. 1% year-over-year, compared to 15. 0% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATEC leads at 29. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MIR or ATEC?
Mirion Technologies, Inc.
(MIR) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus -18. 8% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MIR leads at 5. 6% versus -10. 7% for ATEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATEC leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MIR or ATEC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
(ATEC) trades at 27. 1x forward P/E versus 36. 2x for Mirion Technologies, Inc. — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATEC: 222. 6% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MIR or ATEC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MIR or ATEC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
(ATEC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), +225. 4% 10Y return). Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATEC: +225. 4%, MIR: +98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MIR and ATEC?
These companies operate in different sectors (MIR (Industrials) and ATEC (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MIR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATEC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.