Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MIR vs ATEC vs NUVL vs OSIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Biotechnology
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
MIR vs ATEC vs NUVL vs OSIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $4.83B | $1.17B | $7.53B | $3.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $981M | $595M | $0.00 | $1.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $-125M | $-450M | $152M |
| Gross Margin | 47.1% | 89.6% | — | 32.8% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | -9.6% | — | 12.1% |
| Forward P/E | 36.2x | 27.1x | — | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.26B | $620M | $0.00 | $682M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $412M | $161M | $262M | $106M |
MIR vs ATEC vs NUVL vs OSIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mirion Technologies… (MIR) | 100 | 197.3 | +97.3% |
| Alphatec Holdings, … (ATEC) | 100 | 52.6 | -47.4% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 561.1 | +461.1% |
| OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) | 100 | 241.0 | +141.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MIR vs ATEC vs NUVL vs OSIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ATEC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth 15.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.6%
- 25.0% revenue growth vs NUVL's 1.1%
NUVL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 1.09
- 446.1% 10Y total return vs OSIS's 372.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 15.27x
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 15.27x
OSIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 8.4% margin vs ATEC's -21.1%
- 6.3% ROA vs NUVL's -37.8%, ROIC 11.5% vs -32.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% revenue growth vs NUVL's 1.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs ATEC's -21.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs MIR's 1.98 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.5% vs ATEC's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs NUVL's -37.8%, ROIC 11.5% vs -32.5% |
MIR vs ATEC vs NUVL vs OSIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MIR vs ATEC vs NUVL vs OSIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NUVL leads in 2 of 6 categories
OSIS leads 1 • MIR leads 0 • ATEC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MIR and ATEC and OSIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSIS and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $1.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. OSIS is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATEC's -21.1%. On growth, MIR holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $981M | $595M | $0 | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $192M | $4M | -$346M | $229M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | -$125M | -$450M | $152M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $90M | $7M | -$313M | $77M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.1% | +89.6% | — | +32.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | -9.6% | — | +12.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -21.1% | — | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +1.2% | — | +4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.5% | -100.0% | — | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +37.1% | -17.8% | -3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MIR and OSIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.7x trailing earnings, OSIS trades at a 85% valuation discount to MIR's 179.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OSIS's 17.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATEC's 3752.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $1.2B | $7.5B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $1.6B | $7.3B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 179.55x | -8.07x | -17.50x | 27.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 36.17x | 27.09x | — | 23.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.95x | 3752.09x | — | 17.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.22x | 1.54x | — | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.69x | 32.28x | 5.96x | 4.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 45.15x | 422.56x | — | 70.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OSIS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OSIS delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ATEC. MIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATEC's 17.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MIR scores 6/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | -4.4% | -42.8% | +16.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | -15.8% | -37.8% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | -12.6% | -32.5% | +11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | -13.7% | -34.4% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 17.21x | — | 0.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $848M | $459M | -$262M | $576M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $412M | $161M | $262M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $620M | $0 | $682M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.48x | -3.29x | -26.85x | 11.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,129 for ATEC. Over the past 12 months, NUVL leads with a +53.5% total return vs ATEC's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVL at 39.5% vs ATEC's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.1% | -62.7% | +1.5% | -5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.7% | -37.8% | +53.5% | +8.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.7% | -47.8% | +171.2% | +103.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.4% | -48.7% | +446.1% | +149.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.5% | +225.4% | +446.1% | +372.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.1% | -19.5% | +39.5% | +26.8% |
Risk & Volatility
NUVL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NUVL is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MIR's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVL currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs ATEC's 33.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 1.13x | 1.09x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.28 | $23.29 | $113.02 | $311.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.98 | $6.85 | $63.56 | $204.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.2% | +33.3% | +90.6% | +77.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.8 | 26.8 | 52.9 | 30.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 3.0M | 544K | 285K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MIR as "Buy", ATEC as "Buy", NUVL as "Buy", OSIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 222.6% upside for ATEC (target: $25) vs 21.7% for OSIS (target: $294).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.50 | $25.00 | $144.40 | $293.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 16 | 14 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% |
NUVL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). OSIS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
MIR vs ATEC vs NUVL vs OSIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MIR or ATEC or NUVL or OSIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
(ATEC) is the stronger pick with 25. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 5% for Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR). OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) offers the better valuation at 27. 7x trailing P/E (23. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MIR or ATEC or NUVL or OSIS?
On trailing P/E, OSI Systems, Inc.
(OSIS) is the cheapest at 27. 7x versus Mirion Technologies, Inc. at 179. 5x. On forward P/E, OSI Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MIR or ATEC or NUVL or OSIS?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to -48. 7% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +446. 1% versus MIR's +98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MIR or ATEC or NUVL or OSIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Mirion Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 98β — meaning MIR is approximately 81% more volatile than NUVL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 17% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MIR or ATEC or NUVL or OSIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
(ATEC) is pulling ahead at 25. 0% versus 7. 5% for Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mirion Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 161. 1% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATEC leads at 29. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MIR or ATEC or NUVL or OSIS?
OSI Systems, Inc.
(OSIS) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus -18. 8% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OSIS leads at 12. 7% versus -10. 7% for ATEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATEC leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MIR or ATEC or NUVL or OSIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OSI Systems, Inc.
(OSIS) trades at 23. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 2x for Mirion Technologies, Inc. — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATEC: 222. 6% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MIR or ATEC or NUVL or OSIS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MIR or ATEC or NUVL or OSIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), +446. 1% 10Y return). Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NUVL: +446. 1%, MIR: +98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MIR and ATEC and NUVL and OSIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MIR (Industrials) and ATEC (Healthcare) and NUVL (Healthcare) and OSIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MIR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATEC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OSIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.