Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MPLX vs PAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
MPLX vs PAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $56.51B | $15.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.54B | $44.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.71B | $1.44B |
| Gross Margin | 60.0% | 3.3% |
| Operating Margin | 44.9% | 3.2% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $26.16B | $7.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.14B | $348M |
MPLX vs PAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPLX Lp (MPLX) | 100 | 293.1 | +193.1% |
| Plains All American… (PAA) | 100 | 228.6 | +128.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPLX vs PAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 7.1%
- Rev growth 8.4%, EPS growth 14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 179.5% 10Y total return vs PAA's 51.4%
PAA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 60.6%, current ratio 0.97x
- Beta 0.11 vs MPLX's 0.18, lower leverage
- +46.4% vs MPLX's +20.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.4% revenue growth vs PAA's 2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.6x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs PAA's 3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs MPLX's 0.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs PAA's 5.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.4% vs MPLX's +20.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs PAA's 4.8%, ROIC 9.9% vs 4.2% |
MPLX vs PAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MPLX vs PAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAA is the larger business by revenue, generating $44.3B annually — 3.5x MPLX's $12.5B. MPLX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAA's 3.2%. On growth, MPLX holds the edge at +5.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.5B | $44.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7.0B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.7B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.0B | $2.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.0% | +3.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.9% | +3.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.8% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.2% | -19.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +14.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PAA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, MPLX trades at a 62% valuation discount to PAA's 30.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PAA's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPLX's 13.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56.5B | $15.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80.5B | $23.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.55x | 30.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.57x | 13.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.17x | 10.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.78x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.90x | 1.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.78x | 8.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPLX delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $6 for PAA. PAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MPLX's 1.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPLX scores 6/9 vs PAA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.8% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.3% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.9% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.80x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24.0B | $7.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $348M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26.2B | $7.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.85x | 7.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAA five years ago would be worth $29,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25,772 for MPLX. Over the past 12 months, PAA leads with a +46.4% total return vs MPLX's +20.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAA at 27.6% vs MPLX's 24.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.3% | +26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.0% | +46.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.9% | +107.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.7% | +195.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.5% | +51.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.7% | +27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PAA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPLX's 0.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAA currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs MPLX's 92.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.18x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.98 | $23.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $47.80 | $15.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.8% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 60.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
MPLX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MPLX as "Buy" and PAA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for MPLX (target: $60) vs 1.9% for PAA (target: $23). For income investors, MPLX offers the higher dividend yield at 7.08% vs PAA's 5.73%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $60.25 | $22.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.1% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.94 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% |
MPLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PAA leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
MPLX vs PAA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPLX or PAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the stronger pick with 8.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. (PAA). MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MPLX Lp (MPLX) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPLX or PAA?
On trailing P/E, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the cheapest at 11.
5x versus Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. at 30. 4x. On forward P/E, MPLX Lp is actually cheaper at 12. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPLX or PAA?
Over the past 5 years, Plains All American Pipeline, L.
P. (PAA) delivered a total return of +195. 7%, compared to +157. 7% for MPLX Lp (MPLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPLX returned +179. 5% versus PAA's +51. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPLX or PAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Plains All American Pipeline, L.
P. (PAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus MPLX Lp's 0. 18β — meaning MPLX is approximately 71% more volatile than PAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. (PAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 180% for MPLX Lp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPLX or PAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MPLX Lp (MPLX) is pulling ahead at 8.
4% versus 2. 8% for Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. (PAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MPLX Lp grew EPS 14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 9% for Plains All American Pipeline, L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAA leads at 6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPLX or PAA?
MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
6% net margin versus 1. 5% for Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. — meaning it keeps 41. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPLX leads at 40. 3% versus 2. 4% for PAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPLX leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPLX or PAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MPLX Lp (MPLX) trades at 12.
6x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPLX: 8. 2% to $60. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPLX or PAA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 5. 7% for Plains All American Pipeline, L. P. (PAA).
09Is MPLX or PAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
18), 7. 1% yield, +179. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MPLX: +179. 5%, PAA: +51. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPLX and PAA?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MPLX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PAA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.