Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MRBK vs FXNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
MRBK vs FXNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $237M | $273M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $205M | $115M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 54.4% | 74.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | 19.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 12.8x |
| Total Debt | $178M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $161M |
MRBK vs FXNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meridian Corporation (MRBK) | 100 | 251.7 | +151.7% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRBK vs FXNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.65, yield 2.5%, current ratio 0.19x
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 12.8x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
FXNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 258.5% 10Y total return vs MRBK's 158.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MRBK's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 12.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs MRBK's 0.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, vs FXNC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs MRBK's +57.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
MRBK vs FXNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MRBK vs FXNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRBK is the larger business by revenue, generating $205M annually — 1.8x FXNC's $115M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.4% (FXNC) to 10.6% (MRBK).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $205M | $115M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.4% | +74.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +19.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +15.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.5% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
MRBK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, MRBK trades at a 31% valuation discount to FXNC's 15.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FXNC's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MRBK's 14.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $237M | $273M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $405M | $155M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.56x | 15.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.74x | 12.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 10.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.19x | 7.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.51x | 12.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRBK delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $10 for FXNC. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRBK's 0.89x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $168M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $178M | $43M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.36x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FXNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FXNC five years ago would be worth $17,101 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,068 for MRBK. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +57.8% total return vs MRBK's +57.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRBK at 30.1% vs FXNC's 26.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.2% | +24.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.5% | +57.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.0% | +103.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.7% | +71.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +158.0% | +258.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.1% | +26.8% |
Risk & Volatility
FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FXNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRBK's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FXNC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs MRBK's 92.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.67 | $30.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.16 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.2 | 67.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 117K | 79K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MRBK and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MRBK as "Buy" and FXNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.2% upside for MRBK (target: $21) vs -30.4% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, MRBK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs FXNC's 2.03%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.1% |
FXNC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MRBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MRBK vs FXNC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRBK or FXNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Meridian Corporation (MRBK). Meridian Corporation (MRBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Meridian Corporation (MRBK) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRBK or FXNC?
On trailing P/E, Meridian Corporation (MRBK) is the cheapest at 10.
6x versus First National Corporation at 15. 4x. On forward P/E, Meridian Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRBK or FXNC?
Over the past 5 years, First National Corporation (FXNC) delivered a total return of +71.
0%, compared to +70. 7% for Meridian Corporation (MRBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +258. 5% versus MRBK's +158. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRBK or FXNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First National Corporation (FXNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus Meridian Corporation's 0. 65β — meaning MRBK is approximately 24% more volatile than FXNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 89% for Meridian Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRBK or FXNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus 4. 1% for Meridian Corporation (MRBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to 30. 3% for Meridian Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRBK or FXNC?
First National Corporation (FXNC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus 10. 6% for Meridian Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FXNC leads at 19. 6% versus 13. 8% for MRBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRBK or FXNC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Meridian Corporation (MRBK) trades at 9.
7x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for First National Corporation — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRBK: 5. 2% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRBK or FXNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Meridian Corporation (MRBK) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 2. 0% for First National Corporation (FXNC).
09Is MRBK or FXNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 2. 0% yield, +258. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FXNC: +258. 5%, MRBK: +158. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRBK and FXNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MRBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.