Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NAVN vs MMYT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
NAVN vs MMYT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $4.32B | $3.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $537M | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-181M | $57M |
| Gross Margin | 63.8% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | -20.1% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 62.7x |
| Total Debt | $672M | $237M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $306M | $509M |
Quick Verdict: NAVN vs MMYT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAVN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 33.5%, EPS growth 45.5%
- 33.5% revenue growth vs MMYT's 25.0%
- +12.2% vs MMYT's -58.8%
MMYT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 150.4% 10Y total return vs NAVN's 12.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 19.6%, current ratio 1.85x
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 1.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.5% revenue growth vs MMYT's 25.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs NAVN's -33.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (19.6% vs 5.9%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.2% vs MMYT's -58.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs NAVN's -16.8%, ROIC 9.2% vs -16.0% |
NAVN vs MMYT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NAVN vs MMYT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMYT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMYT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 1.9x NAVN's $537M. MMYT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVN's -33.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $537M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $175M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $224M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.8% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.1% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.7% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.6% | +21.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -68.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MMYT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.37x | 52.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 62.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.05x | 3.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 40.25x | 4.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MMYT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMYT delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-109 for NAVN. MMYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVN's 5.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMYT scores 6/9 vs NAVN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -108.6% | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.8% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.0% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.2% | +9.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.89x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $367M | -$272M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $306M | $509M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $672M | $237M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.42x | 1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMYT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMYT five years ago would be worth $17,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,224 for NAVN. Over the past 12 months, NAVN leads with a +12.2% total return vs MMYT's -58.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMYT at 17.6% vs NAVN's 3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.0% | -47.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.2% | -58.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | +62.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | +75.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | +150.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.9% | +17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NAVN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Risk & Volatility
NAVN currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs MMYT's 39.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.39 | $110.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.12 | $32.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +39.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.4 | 41.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NAVN as "Buy" and MMYT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.4% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs 20.4% for NAVN (target: $22).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.30 | $91.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% |
MMYT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NAVN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
NAVN vs MMYT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAVN or MMYT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Navan, Inc.
(NAVN) is the stronger pick with 33. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 25. 0% for MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT). MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) offers the better valuation at 52. 1x trailing P/E (62. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Navan, Inc. (NAVN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NAVN or MMYT?
Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +75.
6%, compared to +12. 2% for Navan, Inc. (NAVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMYT returned +150. 4% versus NAVN's +12. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NAVN or MMYT?
On balance sheet safety, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 6% for Navan, Inc.
— giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NAVN or MMYT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Navan, Inc.
(NAVN) is pulling ahead at 33. 5% versus 25. 0% for MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Navan, Inc. grew EPS 45. 5% year-over-year, compared to -54. 6% for MakeMyTrip Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NAVN or MMYT?
MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
7% net margin versus -33. 7% for Navan, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMYT leads at 12. 3% versus -20. 1% for NAVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MMYT leads at 72. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NAVN or MMYT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 110.
4% to $91. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — NAVN or MMYT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NAVN or MMYT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
21), +150. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMYT: +150. 4%, NAVN: +12. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NAVN and MMYT?
These companies operate in different sectors (NAVN (Technology) and MMYT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.