Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NBIS vs LGND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
NBIS vs LGND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $42.82B | $4.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $534M | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $102M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 68.0% | 85.9% |
| Operating Margin | -113.3% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1773.5x | 23.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.89B | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.68B | $72M |
NBIS vs LGND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) | 100 | 864.2 | +764.2% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 100 | 199.0 | +99.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBIS vs LGND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBIS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.07
- Rev growth 350.9%, EPS growth 104.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 239.8%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs LGND's 95.1%
LGND carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 8.93x
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 8.93x
- Lower P/E (23.6x vs 1773.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 350.9% revenue growth vs LGND's 27.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.6x vs 1773.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs NBIS's 19.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs NBIS's 3.07, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.8% vs LGND's +125.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs NBIS's 0.8%, ROIC -2.3% vs -13.4% |
NBIS vs LGND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NBIS vs LGND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGND leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $534M annually — 2.1x LGND's $251M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.3% (LGND) to 19.0% (NBIS). On growth, NBIS holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $534M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$287M | $52M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $102M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.3B | $31M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.0% | +85.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -113.3% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +12.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.0% | +122.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -79.3% | +15.6% |
Valuation Metrics
LGND leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42.8B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44.0B | $4.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1773.55x | -1057.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 356.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 80.81x | 27.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.70x | 5.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 59.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LGND leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LGND delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $2 for NBIS. LGND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NBIS's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBIS scores 7/9 vs LGND's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.4% | -2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.4% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.06x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | -$65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.7B | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.9B | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -30.21x | 22.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBIS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBIS five years ago would be worth $97,545 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,386 for LGND. Over the past 12 months, NBIS leads with a +679.1% total return vs LGND's +125.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBIS at 113.7% vs LGND's 44.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +116.9% | +22.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +679.1% | +125.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +875.5% | +200.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +875.5% | +83.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +875.4% | +95.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +113.7% | +44.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBIS and LGND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGND is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBIS's 3.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBIS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs LGND's 94.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.07x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $195.99 | $247.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.25 | $98.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.5 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16.5M | 216K |
Analyst Outlook
NBIS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NBIS as "Buy" and LGND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.1% upside for LGND (target: $268) vs -13.5% for NBIS (target: $169).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $168.67 | $267.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LGND leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NBIS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
NBIS vs LGND: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBIS or LGND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nebius Group N.
V. (NBIS) is the stronger pick with 350. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 3% for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND). Nebius Group N. V. (NBIS) offers the better valuation at 1773. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nebius Group N. V. (NBIS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NBIS or LGND?
Over the past 5 years, Nebius Group N.
V. (NBIS) delivered a total return of +875. 5%, compared to +83. 9% for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBIS returned +823. 8% versus LGND's +73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NBIS or LGND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Nebius Group N. V. 's 3. 07β — meaning NBIS is approximately 210% more volatile than LGND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 106% for Nebius Group N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NBIS or LGND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nebius Group N.
V. (NBIS) is pulling ahead at 350. 9% versus 27. 3% for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nebius Group N. V. grew EPS 104. 8% year-over-year, compared to -107. 5% for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NBIS leads at 239. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NBIS or LGND?
Nebius Group N.
V. (NBIS) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus -2. 4% for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LGND leads at -13. 5% versus -112. 5% for NBIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LGND leads at 93. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NBIS or LGND more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LGND: 15.
1% to $267. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — NBIS or LGND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NBIS or LGND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99)). Nebius Group N. V. (NBIS) carries a higher beta of 3. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LGND: +73. 0%, NBIS: +823. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NBIS and LGND?
These companies operate in different sectors (NBIS (Communication Services) and LGND (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 250%
- Net Margin > 11%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.