Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.33B | $1.51B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $867M | $606M | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $169M | $80M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 72.1% | 44.2% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | 18.6% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 9.3x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $327M | $1.17B | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $185M | $92M | $668M |
NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 142.7 | +42.7% |
| ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB) | 100 | 205.2 | +105.2% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.1 | +88.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
CNOB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.7x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
- 127.7% 10Y total return vs CNOB's 110.8%
- PEG 1.42 vs NBTB's 1.52
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs CNOB's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CNOB's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.7% vs NBTB's +7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRMK leads 1 • CNOB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRMK each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 1.8x CNOB's $606M. TRMK is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNOB's 13.3%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $867M | $606M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $241M | $122M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $169M | $80M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $225M | $102M | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.1% | +44.2% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +18.6% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +13.3% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +16.7% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.5% | +53.1% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 40% valuation discount to CNOB's 20.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs NBTB's 1.91x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $1.5B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $2.6B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.42x | 20.32x | 12.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.71x | 9.31x | 11.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.91x | — | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.27x | 22.98x | 9.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.69x | 2.49x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 0.96x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.66x | 14.98x | 11.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMK delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNOB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNOB's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +5.5% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +3.5% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +1.5% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.74x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $142M | $1.1B | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $185M | $92M | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $327M | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.05x | 0.39x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CNOB and TRMK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMK five years ago would be worth $14,841 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,897 for CNOB. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +31.7% total return vs NBTB's +7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNOB at 30.4% vs NBTB's 15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.3% | +15.8% | +15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.1% | +30.7% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.6% | +121.8% | +110.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.4% | +19.0% | +48.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.4% | +110.8% | +127.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.4% | +30.4% | +28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and CNOB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNOB's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNOB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs NBTB's 95.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 1.10x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.92 | $30.15 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.20 | $21.79 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +99.8% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 61.7 | 51.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 232K | 351K | 396K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", CNOB as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.0% upside for CNOB (target: $34) vs 1.7% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs CNOB's 2.11%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $34.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 11 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.1% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.43 | $0.63 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.1% | +3.0% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). TRMK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBTB or CNOB or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. at 20. 3x. On forward P/E, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 52x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +48.
4%, compared to +19. 0% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 7% versus NBTB's +103. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CNOB is approximately 24% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 74% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -15. 9% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus 13. 3% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 18. 6% for CNOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NBTB or CNOB or TRMK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 52x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Trustmark Corporation — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNOB: 13. 0% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NBTB or CNOB or TRMK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 1% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB).
09Is NBTB or CNOB or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +103. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +103. 4%, CNOB: +110. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NBTB and CNOB and TRMK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.