NEWP vs PAAS

Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Pacific Metals Corp. (NEWP) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) delivered a total return of +69. 1%, compared to +19. 4% for New Pacific Metals Corp. (NEWP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEWP returned +20. 9% versus PAAS's +293. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus New Pacific Metals Corp. 's 1. 27β — meaning NEWP is approximately 73% more volatile than PAAS relative to the S&P 500.

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pan American Silver Corp.

grew EPS 741. 9% year-over-year, compared to 36. 9% for New Pacific Metals Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for New Pacific Metals Corp. — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAAS leads at 32. 3% versus 0. 0% for NEWP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAAS leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAAS: 32.

5% to $75. 00.

In this comparison, PAAS (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. NEWP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 8% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAAS: +293. 8%, NEWP: +20. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NEWP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PAAS pays a dividend while NEWP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.