Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NEXT vs CLNE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
NEXT vs CLNE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Cap | $1.98B | $491M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $425M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-306M | $-222M |
| Gross Margin | — | -0.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -35.0% |
| Total Debt | $8.66B | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $144M | $158M |
NEXT vs CLNE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NextDecade Corporat… (NEXT) | 100 | 504.6 | +404.6% |
| Clean Energy Fuels … (CLNE) | 100 | 110.5 | +10.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEXT vs CLNE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEXT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -24.5% 10Y total return vs CLNE's -28.9%
- -1.4% margin vs CLNE's -52.2%
- -3.3% ROA vs CLNE's -21.0%
CLNE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth -173.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 17.5%, current ratio 2.32x
- Beta 1.19, current ratio 2.32x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.2% revenue growth vs NEXT's -429.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.4% margin vs CLNE's -52.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (17.5% vs 376.2%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.6% vs NEXT's +1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.3% ROA vs CLNE's -21.0% |
NEXT vs CLNE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NEXT vs CLNE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLNE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLNE and NEXT operate at a comparable scale, with $425M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $425M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$211M | -$64M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$306M | -$222M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5.3B | $32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -0.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -35.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -52.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -172.0% | -61.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NEXT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $491M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.5B | $432M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.38x | -2.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.85x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLNE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEXT delivers a -15.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-39 for CLNE. CLNE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEXT's 3.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLNE scores 4/9 vs NEXT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.6% | -39.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | -21.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.7% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.76x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.5B | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $144M | $158M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.7B | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.76x | -3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEXT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEXT five years ago would be worth $36,618 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,288 for CLNE. Over the past 12 months, CLNE leads with a +43.6% total return vs NEXT's +1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEXT at 8.2% vs CLNE's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.8% | +3.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.9% | +43.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | -47.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +266.2% | -77.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.5% | -28.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | -19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEXT and CLNE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEXT is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLNE's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLNE currently trades 72.0% from its 52-week high vs NEXT's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.14x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.12 | $3.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.75 | $1.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.6% | +72.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.1M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NEXT as "Hold" and CLNE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 56.2% upside for CLNE (target: $4) vs -6.3% for NEXT (target: $7).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% |
CLNE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NEXT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
NEXT vs CLNE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEXT or CLNE a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
(CLNE) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NEXT or CLNE?
Over the past 5 years, NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) delivered a total return of +266.
2%, compared to -77. 1% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEXT returned -23. 0% versus CLNE's -26. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NEXT or CLNE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 's 1. 19β — meaning CLNE is approximately -969% more volatile than NEXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 4% for NextDecade Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NEXT or CLNE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
grew EPS -173. 0% year-over-year, compared to -387. 5% for NextDecade Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NEXT or CLNE?
NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -52. 3% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEXT leads at 0. 0% versus -35. 0% for CLNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEXT leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NEXT or CLNE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NEXT or CLNE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEXT: -23. 0%, CLNE: -26. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NEXT and CLNE?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.