NGD vs HL

For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 5% for New Gold Inc. (NGD). Hecla Mining Company (HL) offers the better valuation at 34. 8x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Gold Inc. (NGD) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the cheapest at 34.

8x versus New Gold Inc. at 64. 9x. On forward P/E, New Gold Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, New Gold Inc.

(NGD) delivered a total return of +427. 9%, compared to +175. 0% for Hecla Mining Company (HL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +328. 0% versus NGD's +106. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Gold Inc.

(NGD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Hecla Mining Company's 1. 26β — meaning HL is approximately 29% more volatile than NGD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hecla Mining Company (HL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 38% for New Gold Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.

0% versus 17. 5% for New Gold Inc. (NGD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 248. 5% for New Gold Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HL leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

6% net margin versus 11. 1% for New Gold Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus 19. 7% for NGD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, New Gold Inc.

(NGD) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Hecla Mining Company — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HL: 39. 8% to $23. 83.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, New Gold Inc.

(NGD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97), +106. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NGD: +106. 8%, HL: +328. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.