NIXXW vs GFAI vs AEYE

For growth investors, AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -80. 8% for Nixxy, Inc. (NIXXW). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Nixxy, Inc.

(NIXXW) delivered a total return of +81. 0%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +102. 2% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nixxy, Inc.

(NIXXW) is the lower-risk stock at -3. 01β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 31β — meaning GFAI is approximately -177% more volatile than NIXXW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 46% for Nixxy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus -80. 8% for Nixxy, Inc. (NIXXW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -215. 7% for Nixxy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEYE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is the more profitable company, earning -7. 6% net margin versus -36. 9% for Nixxy, Inc. — meaning it keeps -7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEYE leads at -7. 9% versus -24. 4% for NIXXW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NIXXW leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nixxy, Inc.

(NIXXW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -3. 01)). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NIXXW: +81. 0%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (NIXXW (Industrials) and GFAI (Industrials) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.