NOTE vs VRSK

For growth investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the stronger pick with 6. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 7% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE). Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E (22. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) a "Hold" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) delivered a total return of +1. 8%, compared to -99. 8% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRSK returned +137. 1% versus NOTE's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 79β — meaning NOTE is approximately -7863% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is pulling ahead at 6. 6% versus -20. 7% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Verisk Analytics, Inc. grew EPS -3. 3% year-over-year, compared to -660. 2% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRSK leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -68. 4% for FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRSK leads at 44. 6% versus -38. 9% for NOTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NOTE leads at 69. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, VRSK (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. NOTE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 1. 0% yield, +137. 1% 10Y return). FiscalNote Holdings, Inc. (NOTE) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +137. 1%, NOTE: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (NOTE (Technology) and VRSK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

VRSK pays a dividend while NOTE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.