NOVT vs CGNX

For growth investors, Cognex Corporation (CGNX) is the stronger pick with 8.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for Novanta Inc. (NOVT). Cognex Corporation (CGNX) offers the better valuation at 91. 6x trailing P/E (50. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Novanta Inc. (NOVT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Cognex Corporation (CGNX) is the cheapest at 91.

6x versus Novanta Inc. at 94. 5x. On forward P/E, Novanta Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Novanta Inc.

(NOVT) delivered a total return of +9. 6%, compared to -19. 2% for Cognex Corporation (CGNX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NOVT returned +881. 6% versus CGNX's +228. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cognex Corporation (CGNX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

50β versus Novanta Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning NOVT is approximately 34% more volatile than CGNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cognex Corporation (CGNX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 26% for Novanta Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cognex Corporation (CGNX) is pulling ahead at 8.

7% versus 3. 3% for Novanta Inc. (NOVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cognex Corporation grew EPS 9. 7% year-over-year, compared to -16. 9% for Novanta Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NOVT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Cognex Corporation (CGNX) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

5% net margin versus 5. 5% for Novanta Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CGNX leads at 16. 3% versus 11. 9% for NOVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CGNX leads at 66. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Novanta Inc.

(NOVT) trades at 39. 0x forward P/E versus 50. 1x for Cognex Corporation — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NOVT: 8. 0% to $150. 00.

In this comparison, CGNX (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. NOVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cognex Corporation (CGNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

5% yield, +228. 2% 10Y return). Novanta Inc. (NOVT) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CGNX: +228. 2%, NOVT: +881. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

CGNX pays a dividend while NOVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.