NPAC
New Providence Acquisition Corp. III
Shell Companies
Market Cap$67K
5Y Perf.+2.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NPAC vs PSFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PSFE
Paysafe Limited
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$485M
5Y Perf.-24.0%
NPAC vs PSFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NPAC | PSFE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $67K | $485M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-222.00 | $-183M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $68.00 | $2.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $1.35B |
NPAC vs PSFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NPAC
PSFE
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Providence Acqu… (NPAC) | 100 | 102.4 | +2.4% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 76.0 | -24.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NPAC vs PSFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NPAC leads in 2 of 4 categories, making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. Paysafe Limited is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NPAC
New Providence Acquisition Corp. III
The Banking Pick
NPAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.02
- 2.4% 10Y total return vs PSFE's -92.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, current ratio 0.33x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
PSFE
Paysafe Limited
The Niche Pick
PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -3.8% ROA vs NPAC's -286.5%
Best for: efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stability / Safety | NPAC | Beta 0.02 vs PSFE's 2.35 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NPAC | +2.4% vs PSFE's -37.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PSFE | -3.8% ROA vs NPAC's -286.5% |
NPAC vs PSFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
NPAC vs PSFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNPACLAGGINGPSFE
PSFEPaysafe Limited
1leads
NPACNew Providence Acquis…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PSFEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
—
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PSFE5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NPAC5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
NPAC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and NPAC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | NPACNew Providence Ac… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $371M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $136M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -183.3% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NPAC and PSFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NPACNew Providence Ac… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67,338 | $485M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $67,406 | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -302.64x | -2.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9999.00x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.17x |
Evenly matched — NPAC and PSFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSFE delivers a -24.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-24 in annual profit, vs $-34 for NPAC. PSFE carries lower financial leverage with a 4.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NPAC's 10.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSFE scores 4/9 vs NPAC's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | NPACNew Providence Ac… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.3% | -24.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | -3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.3% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 10.51x | 4.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $68 | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $68 | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.84x |
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NPAC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NPAC five years ago would be worth $10,238 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, NPAC leads with a +2.4% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NPAC at 0.8% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NPACNew Providence Ac… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.4% | -37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.4% | -34.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.4% | -94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.4% | -92.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.8% | -13.3% |
NPAC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NPAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NPAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NPAC currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NPACNew Providence Ac… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 2.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.87 | $16.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.00 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.7 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 136K | 361K |
NPAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | NPACNew Providence Ac… | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.9% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
NPAC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). PSFE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallNew Providence Acquisition … (NPAC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NPAC vs PSFE: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NPAC or PSFE a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NPAC or PSFE?
Over the past 5 years, New Providence Acquisition Corp.
III (NPAC) delivered a total return of +2. 4%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NPAC returned +2. 4% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NPAC or PSFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Providence Acquisition Corp.
III (NPAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately 13077% more volatile than NPAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 11% for New Providence Acquisition Corp. III — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — NPAC or PSFE?
New Providence Acquisition Corp.
III (NPAC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSFE leads at 7. 2% versus 0. 0% for NPAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSFE leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — NPAC or PSFE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is NPAC or PSFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Providence Acquisition Corp.
III (NPAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NPAC: +2. 4%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between NPAC and PSFE?
These companies operate in different sectors (NPAC (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.