Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NWL vs HBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
NWL vs HBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $1.97B | $2.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.19B | $3.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-281M | $330M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | 42.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.2x | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $5.65B | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $203M | $215M |
NWL vs HBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) | 100 | 35.2 | -64.8% |
| Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWL vs HBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.91, yield 6.2%
- Rev growth -5.0%, EPS growth -30.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.7%
- Lower P/E (8.2x vs 9.8x)
HBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -62.4% 10Y total return vs NWL's -75.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.72, current ratio 1.37x
- Beta 1.72, current ratio 1.37x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.6% revenue growth vs NWL's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 9.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs NWL's -3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.72 vs NWL's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.6% vs NWL's -1.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.7% ROA vs NWL's -2.5%, ROIC 4.5% vs 4.3% |
NWL vs HBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NWL vs HBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWL is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 2.1x HBI's $3.4B. HBI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NWL's -3.9%. On growth, NWL holds the edge at -1.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.2B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $696M | $496M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$281M | $330M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +42.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | -0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.1% | -4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.9% | +8.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NWL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NWL's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HBI's 16.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.4B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.80x | -7.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.24x | 9.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.78x | 16.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 66.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 115.61x | 10.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HBI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBI delivers a 73.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $74 in annual profit, vs $-11 for NWL. NWL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBI's 75.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HBI scores 4/9 vs NWL's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.1% | +73.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.36x | 75.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $203M | $215M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.01x | 2.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBI five years ago would be worth $3,434 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,510 for NWL. Over the past 12 months, HBI leads with a +35.6% total return vs NWL's -1.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBI at 14.2% vs NWL's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.2% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.7% | +35.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.1% | +49.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.9% | -65.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | -62.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | +14.2% |
Risk & Volatility
HBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HBI is the less volatile stock with a 1.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWL's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBI currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs NWL's 69.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.64 | $7.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.07 | $3.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.7% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.9M | 104.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NWL as "Hold" and HBI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.9% upside for NWL (target: $6) vs 12.1% for HBI (target: $7). NWL is the only dividend payer here at 6.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.50 | $7.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HBI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NWL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NWL vs HBI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWL or HBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hanesbrands Inc.
(HBI) is the stronger pick with -3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL). Analysts rate Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NWL or HBI?
Over the past 5 years, Hanesbrands Inc.
(HBI) delivered a total return of -65. 7%, compared to -74. 9% for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HBI returned -62. 4% versus NWL's -75. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NWL or HBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hanesbrands Inc.
(HBI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 72β versus Newell Brands Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning NWL is approximately 12% more volatile than HBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 75% for Hanesbrands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NWL or HBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hanesbrands Inc.
(HBI) is pulling ahead at -3. 6% versus -5. 0% for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newell Brands Inc. grew EPS -30. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1698. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NWL leads at -8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NWL or HBI?
Newell Brands Inc.
(NWL) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 0% net margin versus -9. 1% for Hanesbrands Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWL leads at 6. 2% versus 5. 3% for HBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HBI leads at 38. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NWL or HBI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Newell Brands Inc.
(NWL) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 9. 8x for Hanesbrands Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWL: 18. 9% to $5. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — NWL or HBI?
In this comparison, NWL (6.
2% yield) pays a dividend. HBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NWL or HBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Newell Brands Inc.
(NWL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6. 2% yield). Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWL: -75. 0%, HBI: -62. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NWL and HBI?
These companies operate in different sectors (NWL (Consumer Defensive) and HBI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NWL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NWL pays a dividend while HBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.