Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NWS vs NWSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
NWS vs NWSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $16.89B | $15.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.80B | $9.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.05B | $1.69B |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 7.8% |
| Forward P/E | 29.4x | 25.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.94B | $2.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.40B | $2.40B |
NWS vs NWSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| News Corporation (NWS) | 100 | 251.6 | +151.6% |
| News Corporation (NWSA) | 100 | 220.7 | +120.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWS vs NWSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 2.4%, EPS growth 72.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.6%
- 158.3% 10Y total return vs NWSA's 136.5%
NWSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (25.8x vs 29.4x)
- 18.7% margin vs NWS's 11.9%
- 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NWS's 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.4% revenue growth vs NWSA's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.8x vs 29.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.7% margin vs NWS's 11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs NWSA's 0.60 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NWS's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.3% vs NWS's -4.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.9% ROA vs NWS's 6.8%, ROIC 6.8% vs 10.5% |
NWS vs NWSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NWS vs NWSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NWS and NWSA each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWSA and NWS operate at a comparable scale, with $9.0B and $8.8B in trailing revenue. NWSA is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NWS's 11.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.8B | $9.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $588M | $469M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $566M | $572M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +7.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +18.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +6.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NWSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, NWSA trades at a 66% valuation discount to NWS's 38.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NWS's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NWSA's 11.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.9B | $15.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.4B | $15.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.09x | 13.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.38x | 25.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.94x | 11.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.00x | 1.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.23x | 21.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NWS and NWSA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWSA delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $11 for NWS. NWS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWSA's 0.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWS scores 8/9 vs NWSA's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | +18.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +10.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.5% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.7% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $537M | $537M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 38.25x | 127.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NWS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NWS five years ago would be worth $12,554 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,219 for NWSA. Over the past 12 months, NWSA leads with a -3.3% total return vs NWS's -4.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NWS at 22.1% vs NWSA's 17.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.9% | -3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.0% | +61.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.5% | +2.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +158.3% | +136.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.1% | +17.3% |
Risk & Volatility
NWS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NWS is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWSA's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.58 | $31.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.49 | $22.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.7% | +85.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
NWSA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NWS as "Buy" and NWSA as "Buy". For income investors, NWSA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs NWS's 1.05%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $32.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +1.0% |
NWSA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). NWS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
NWS vs NWSA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWS or NWSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, News Corporation (NWS) is the stronger pick with 2.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWSA). News Corporation (NWSA) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (25. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWS) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWS or NWSA?
On trailing P/E, News Corporation (NWSA) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus News Corporation at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, News Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWS or NWSA?
Over the past 5 years, News Corporation (NWS) delivered a total return of +25.
5%, compared to +2. 2% for News Corporation (NWSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWS returned +158. 3% versus NWSA's +136. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWS or NWSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), News Corporation (NWS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
58β versus News Corporation's 0. 60β — meaning NWSA is approximately 3% more volatile than NWS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, News Corporation (NWS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 31% for News Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWS or NWSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), News Corporation (NWS) is pulling ahead at 2.
4% versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to 72. 3% for News Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NWS leads at -6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWS or NWSA?
News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
0% net margin versus 5. 5% for News Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWS leads at 16. 7% versus 11. 3% for NWSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWS or NWSA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, News Corporation (NWSA) trades at 25.
8x forward P/E versus 29. 4x for News Corporation — 3. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWS or NWSA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
News Corporation (NWSA) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 1. 1% for News Corporation (NWS).
09Is NWS or NWSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, News Corporation (NWS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
58), 1. 1% yield, +158. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWS: +158. 3%, NWSA: +136. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWS and NWSA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NWS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.