Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NWSA vs NYT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Publishing
NWSA vs NYT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Publishing |
| Market Cap | $14.50B | $12.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.85B | $2.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.08B | $338M |
| Gross Margin | 85.5% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 15.2% |
| Forward P/E | 24.2x | 28.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.94B | $48M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.40B | $199M |
NWSA vs NYT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| News Corporation (NWSA) | 100 | 207.7 | +107.7% |
| The New York Times … (NYT) | 100 | 196.9 | +96.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWSA vs NYT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWSA is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.60, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.84x
- Lower P/E (24.2x vs 28.4x)
- 1.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NYT's 0.6%
NYT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 0.6%
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 26.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs NWSA's 125.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% revenue growth vs NWSA's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.2x vs 28.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs NWSA's 12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs NWSA's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NYT's 0.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.3% vs NWSA's -7.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs NWSA's 7.0%, ROIC 16.0% vs 6.8% |
NWSA vs NYT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NWSA vs NYT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NYT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.9B annually — 3.2x NYT's $2.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.3% (NYT) to 12.2% (NWSA). On growth, NWSA holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.9B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $509M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $338M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $652M | $537M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.5% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +15.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +19.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.7% | +9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.7% | +28.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NWSA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, NWSA trades at a 72% valuation discount to NYT's 43.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NWSA's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NYT's 27.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.5B | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.0B | $12.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.29x | 43.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.23x | 28.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.63x | 27.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 4.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 6.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.94x | 32.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NYT leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NYT delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for NWSA. NYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWSA's 0.31x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +17.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.0% | +11.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $537M | -$152M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $48M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 39.56x | 370.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NYT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NYT five years ago would be worth $18,471 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,123 for NWSA. Over the past 12 months, NYT leads with a +49.3% total return vs NWSA's -7.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NYT at 25.5% vs NWSA's 15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.5% | +11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.5% | +49.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.1% | +97.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | +84.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.5% | +557.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.0% | +25.5% |
Risk & Volatility
NYT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NYT is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWSA's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NYT currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs NWSA's 80.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.61 | $87.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.20 | $51.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.5% | +88.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWSA and NYT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NWSA as "Buy" and NYT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.4% upside for NWSA (target: $32) vs -13.3% for NYT (target: $67). For income investors, NWSA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.28% vs NYT's 0.65%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.40 | $67.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $0.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +0.7% |
NYT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NWSA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NWSA vs NYT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWSA or NYT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The New York Times Company (NYT) is the stronger pick with 6.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWSA). News Corporation (NWSA) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (24. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWSA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWSA or NYT?
On trailing P/E, News Corporation (NWSA) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus The New York Times Company at 43. 6x. On forward P/E, News Corporation is actually cheaper at 24. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWSA or NYT?
Over the past 5 years, The New York Times Company (NYT) delivered a total return of +84.
7%, compared to +1. 2% for News Corporation (NWSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NYT returned +557. 1% versus NWSA's +125. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWSA or NYT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The New York Times Company (NYT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
28β versus News Corporation's 0. 60β — meaning NWSA is approximately 116% more volatile than NYT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The New York Times Company (NYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 31% for News Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWSA or NYT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The New York Times Company (NYT) is pulling ahead at 6.
6% versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to 26. 4% for The New York Times Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NYT leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWSA or NYT?
News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
0% net margin versus 11. 4% for The New York Times Company — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NYT leads at 13. 6% versus 11. 3% for NWSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWSA or NYT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, News Corporation (NWSA) trades at 24.
2x forward P/E versus 28. 4x for The New York Times Company — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWSA: 27. 4% to $32. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWSA or NYT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
News Corporation (NWSA) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 6% for The New York Times Company (NYT).
09Is NWSA or NYT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The New York Times Company (NYT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
28), 0. 6% yield, +557. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NYT: +557. 1%, NWSA: +125. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWSA and NYT?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NYT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.