Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OACC vs RLAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
OACC vs RLAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $261M | $2.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $11M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-273M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -27.8% |
| Forward P/E | 195.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $12K | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $84M |
OACC vs RLAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oaktree Acquisition… (OACC) | 100 | 106.5 | +6.5% |
| Relay Therapeutics,… (RLAY) | 100 | 303.6 | +203.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OACC vs RLAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OACC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.08
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs RLAY's -64.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 2.14x
RLAY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +324.1% vs OACC's +1.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 0.8% margin vs RLAY's -25.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs RLAY's 1.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +324.1% vs OACC's +1.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs RLAY's -40.1% |
OACC vs RLAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RLAY and OACC operate at a comparable scale, with $11M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $11M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$847,195 | -$298M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$273M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$278,200 | -$213M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +66.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -27.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -25.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -20.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -60.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OACC and RLAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $261M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $259M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 195.76x | -7.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9999.00x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 154.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 3.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OACC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OACC delivers a 0.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-44 for RLAY. OACC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RLAY's 0.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLAY scores 5/9 vs OACC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | -43.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -40.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -37.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -42.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$52M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11,824 | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RLAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OACC five years ago would be worth $10,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,241 for RLAY. Over the past 12 months, RLAY leads with a +324.1% total return vs OACC's +1.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RLAY at 5.0% vs OACC's 2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.0% | +52.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.4% | +324.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | +15.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | -57.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | -64.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | +5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
OACC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OACC is the less volatile stock with a 0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RLAY's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OACC currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs RLAY's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.08x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.74 | $17.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.30 | $2.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OACC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). RLAY leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
OACC vs RLAY: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OACC or RLAY a better buy right now?
Oaktree Acquisition Corp.
III Life Sciences (OACC) offers the better valuation at 195. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Relay Therapeutics, Inc. (RLAY) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OACC or RLAY?
Over the past 5 years, Oaktree Acquisition Corp.
III Life Sciences (OACC) delivered a total return of +6. 1%, compared to -57. 6% for Relay Therapeutics, Inc. (RLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OACC returned +6. 1% versus RLAY's -64. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OACC or RLAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oaktree Acquisition Corp.
III Life Sciences (OACC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 08β versus Relay Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RLAY is approximately 2082% more volatile than OACC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oaktree Acquisition Corp. III Life Sciences (OACC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 6% for Relay Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — OACC or RLAY?
Oaktree Acquisition Corp.
III Life Sciences (OACC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1800. 6% for Relay Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OACC leads at 0. 0% versus -1971. 6% for RLAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLAY leads at 76. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — OACC or RLAY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is OACC or RLAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oaktree Acquisition Corp.
III Life Sciences (OACC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 08)). Relay Therapeutics, Inc. (RLAY) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OACC: +6. 1%, RLAY: -64. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between OACC and RLAY?
These companies operate in different sectors (OACC (Financial Services) and RLAY (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OACC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RLAY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.