Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OM vs FMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
OM vs FMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $87M | $11.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $118M | $19.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-75M | $947M |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | 26.0% |
| Operating Margin | -56.9% | 9.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.5x |
| Total Debt | $105M | $10.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $1.60B |
OM vs FMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outset Medical, Inc. (OM) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | 100 | 51.0 | -49.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OM vs FMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 85.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.2%
- 5.1% revenue growth vs FMS's 1.5%
FMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.49, yield 3.8%
- -35.1% 10Y total return vs OM's -99.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 75.6%, current ratio 1.26x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% revenue growth vs FMS's 1.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.9% margin vs OM's -63.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs OM's 2.49, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -20.5% vs OM's -60.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs OM's -27.7%, ROIC 5.6% vs -33.2% |
OM vs FMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OM vs FMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.4B annually — 164.6x OM's $118M. FMS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OM's -63.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $118M | $19.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$65M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$75M | $947M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +26.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -56.9% | +9.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -63.7% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -29.1% | +9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | -5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.2% | -15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
OM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $87M | $11.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $156M | $22.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.87x | 10.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 0.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 0.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FMS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FMS delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-56 for OM. FMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OM's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FMS scores 7/9 vs OM's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.9% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.7% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.2% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.2% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $70M | $9.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $105M | $10.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.86x | 10.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FMS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FMS five years ago would be worth $6,410 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $60 for OM. Over the past 12 months, FMS leads with a -20.5% total return vs OM's -60.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FMS at 0.7% vs OM's -75.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.5% | -7.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -60.1% | -20.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +2.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -35.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -35.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.0% | +0.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FMS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FMS is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OM's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FMS currently trades 71.1% from its 52-week high vs OM's 21.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.49x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.98 | $30.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.00 | $20.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.3% | +71.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 156K | 527K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
FMS is the only dividend payer here at 3.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.5% |
FMS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
OM vs FMS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OM or FMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Outset Medical, Inc.
(OM) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS). Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OM or FMS?
Over the past 5 years, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co.
KGaA (FMS) delivered a total return of -35. 9%, compared to -99. 4% for Outset Medical, Inc. (OM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FMS returned -35. 1% versus OM's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OM or FMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co.
KGaA (FMS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Outset Medical, Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning OM is approximately 407% more volatile than FMS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 76% versus 82% for Outset Medical, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OM or FMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Outset Medical, Inc.
(OM) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus 1. 5% for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Outset Medical, Inc. grew EPS 85. 5% year-over-year, compared to 82. 6% for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA. Over a 3-year CAGR, OM leads at 1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OM or FMS?
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co.
KGaA (FMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -68. 3% for Outset Medical, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FMS leads at 9. 3% versus -55. 8% for OM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OM leads at 39. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OM or FMS?
In this comparison, FMS (3.
8% yield) pays a dividend. OM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is OM or FMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co.
KGaA (FMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), 3. 8% yield). Outset Medical, Inc. (OM) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FMS: -35. 1%, OM: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OM and FMS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FMS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FMS pays a dividend while OM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.