OMAB
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Market Cap$5.15B
5Y Perf.+202.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OMAB vs ASUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ASUR
Asure Software, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$249M
5Y Perf.+40.6%
OMAB vs ASUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OMAB | ASUR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $5.15B | $249M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.96B | $148M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.34B | $-10M |
| Gross Margin | 75.6% | 67.9% |
| Operating Margin | 56.0% | -2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $13.59B | $80M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.10B | $25M |
OMAB vs ASUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OMAB
ASUR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grupo Aeroportuario… (OMAB) | 100 | 302.5 | +202.5% |
| Asure Software, Inc. (ASUR) | 100 | 140.6 | +40.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OMAB vs ASUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OMAB leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Asure Software, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OMAB
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
The Income Pick
OMAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 5.0%
- 189.2% 10Y total return vs ASUR's 66.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, current ratio 1.32x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ASUR
Asure Software, Inc.
The Growth Play
ASUR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth -6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.6%
- 17.3% revenue growth vs OMAB's 5.9%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ASUR | 17.3% revenue growth vs OMAB's 5.9% |
| Value | OMAB | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 10.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | OMAB | 33.5% margin vs ASUR's -6.8% |
| Stability / Safety | OMAB | Beta 0.62 vs ASUR's 1.14 |
| Dividends | OMAB | 5.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | OMAB | +22.9% vs ASUR's -10.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OMAB | 17.6% ROA vs ASUR's -2.0%, ROIC 31.7% vs -2.8% |
OMAB vs ASUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
OMAB vs ASUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOMABLAGGINGASUR
ASURAsure Software, Inc.
1leads
OMABGrupo Aeroportuario d…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ASURMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
OMAB4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ASUR4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OMAB6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
OMAB6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
OMAB2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.0B annually — 107.5x ASUR's $148M. OMAB is the more profitable business, keeping 33.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASUR's -6.8%. On growth, ASUR holds the edge at +22.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | ASURAsure Software, I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.0B | $148M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.8B | $18M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.3B | -$10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.5B | $10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.6% | +67.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | -6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.3% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.0% | +22.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +122.5% |
OMAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ASUR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OMAB's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ASUR's 15.5x.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | ASURAsure Software, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $249M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $304M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.68x | -18.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.77x | 9.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.44x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.14x | 15.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.58x | 1.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.80x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.10x | 11.61x |
ASUR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OMAB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OMAB delivers a 50.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $-5 for ASUR. ASUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OMAB's 1.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OMAB scores 6/9 vs ASUR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | ASURAsure Software, I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +50.6% | -5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.6% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +31.7% | -2.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.6% | -3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.19x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.5B | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.6B | $80M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.08x | -2.02x |
OMAB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OMAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OMAB five years ago would be worth $25,734 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,728 for ASUR. Over the past 12 months, OMAB leads with a +22.9% total return vs ASUR's -10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OMAB at 11.8% vs ASUR's -13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | ASURAsure Software, I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | -4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | -10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.7% | -35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.3% | +7.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +189.2% | +66.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | -13.6% |
OMAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMAB is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASUR's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OMAB currently trades 79.0% from its 52-week high vs ASUR's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | ASURAsure Software, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $134.99 | $11.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $87.09 | $6.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.0% | +75.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.7 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 94K | 104K |
OMAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OMAB as "Buy" and ASUR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 69.7% upside for ASUR (target: $15) vs 19.1% for OMAB (target: $127). OMAB is the only dividend payer here at 5.02% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | ASURAsure Software, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $127.00 | $14.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $92.57 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
OMAB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ASUR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallGrupo Aeroportuario del Cen… (OMAB)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OMAB vs ASUR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OMAB or ASUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Asure Software, Inc.
(ASUR) is the stronger pick with 17. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB). Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OMAB or ASUR?
On forward P/E, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. is actually cheaper at 0. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OMAB or ASUR?
Over the past 5 years, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) delivered a total return of +157. 3%, compared to +7. 3% for Asure Software, Inc. (ASUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OMAB returned +189. 2% versus ASUR's +66. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OMAB or ASUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Asure Software, Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning ASUR is approximately 84% more volatile than OMAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Asure Software, Inc. (ASUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 119% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OMAB or ASUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Asure Software, Inc.
(ASUR) is pulling ahead at 17. 3% versus 5. 9% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. grew EPS 8. 4% year-over-year, compared to -6. 7% for Asure Software, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASUR leads at 13. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OMAB or ASUR?
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 5% net margin versus -9. 3% for Asure Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OMAB leads at 56. 0% versus -6. 0% for ASUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OMAB leads at 75. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OMAB or ASUR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 10. 0x for Asure Software, Inc. — 9. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASUR: 69. 7% to $14. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — OMAB or ASUR?
In this comparison, OMAB (5.
0% yield) pays a dividend. ASUR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OMAB or ASUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62), 5. 0% yield, +189. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMAB: +189. 2%, ASUR: +66. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OMAB and ASUR?
These companies operate in different sectors (OMAB (Industrials) and ASUR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OMAB is a small-cap deep-value stock; ASUR is a small-cap high-growth stock. OMAB pays a dividend while ASUR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OMAB: -0.0% · ASUR: 22.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.