Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ON vs STM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
ON vs STM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $40.39B | $50.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.06B | $12.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $574M | $145M |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 33.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.8% | 3.5% |
| Forward P/E | 35.1x | 48.2x |
| Total Debt | $3.47B | $2.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.15B | $2.84B |
ON vs STM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 622.8 | +522.8% |
| STMicroelectronics … (STM) | 100 | 230.1 | +130.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ON vs STM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.95
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs STM's 9.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.95, Low D/E 45.1%, current ratio 4.52x
STM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -10.8%, EPS growth -89.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.8%
- -10.8% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3%
- 0.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -10.8% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (35.1x vs 48.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.5% margin vs STM's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.95 vs STM's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +167.4% vs STM's +150.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs STM's 0.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 1.3% |
ON vs STM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ON vs STM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ON leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STM is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.4B annually — 2.0x ON's $6.1B. ON is the more profitable business, keeping 9.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STM's 1.2%. On growth, STM holds the edge at +22.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.1B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $574M | $145M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $160M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +33.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +1.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | +22.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.0% | -33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
STM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 317.7x trailing earnings, STM trades at a 10% valuation discount to ON's 354.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ON's 29.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STM's 124.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $40.4B | $50.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41.7B | $50.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 354.13x | 317.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.09x | 48.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.10x | 124.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.74x | 4.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.50x | 2.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.47x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
STM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ON delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $1 for STM. STM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ON's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STM scores 6/9 vs ON's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | -$704M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.5B | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.49x | 28.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ON and STM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ON five years ago would be worth $27,349 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,072 for STM. Over the past 12 months, ON leads with a +167.4% total return vs STM's +150.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STM at 10.9% vs ON's 8.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +81.1% | +109.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +167.4% | +150.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.4% | +36.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.5% | +60.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1005.5% | +981.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.1% | +10.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ON and STM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ON is the less volatile stock with a 1.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STM's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 2.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $105.81 | $57.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.19 | $21.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.1% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.2 | 84.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.7M | 9.6M |
Analyst Outlook
STM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ON as "Buy" and STM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.6% upside for STM (target: $58) vs -39.2% for ON (target: $62). STM is the only dividend payer here at 0.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.40 | $57.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 45 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | +0.7% |
STM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ON leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ON vs STM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ON or STM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, STMicroelectronics N.
V. (STM) is the stronger pick with -10. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM) offers the better valuation at 317. 7x trailing P/E (48. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ON or STM?
On trailing P/E, STMicroelectronics N.
V. (STM) is the cheapest at 317. 7x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 354. 1x. On forward P/E, ON Semiconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 35. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ON or STM?
Over the past 5 years, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) delivered a total return of +173.
5%, compared to +60. 7% for STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ON returned +1005% versus STM's +981. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ON or STM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
95β versus STMicroelectronics N. V. 's 2. 05β — meaning STM is approximately 5% more volatile than ON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 45% for ON Semiconductor Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ON or STM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), STMicroelectronics N.
V. (STM) is pulling ahead at -10. 8% versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: STMicroelectronics N. V. grew EPS -89. 2% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, STM leads at -9. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ON or STM?
ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
0% net margin versus 1. 4% for STMicroelectronics N. V. — meaning it keeps 2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ON leads at 12. 5% versus 2. 7% for STM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STM leads at 33. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ON or STM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) trades at 35.
1x forward P/E versus 48. 2x for STMicroelectronics N. V. — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STM: 0. 6% to $57. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ON or STM?
In this comparison, STM (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ON does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ON or STM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, STMicroelectronics N.
V. (STM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +981. 5% 10Y return). ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STM: +981. 5%, ON: +1005%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ON and STM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
STM pays a dividend while ON does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.