Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OPRA
Opera Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • NO
Market Cap$1.68B
5Y Perf.+203.6%
MNTS
Momentus Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
IAC
IAC InterActive Corp.

Internet Content & Information

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.21B
5Y Perf.-10.7%

OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OPRA logoOPRA
MNTS logoMNTS
IAC logoIAC
IndustryInternet Content & InformationAerospace & DefenseInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$1.68B$3M$3.21B
Revenue (TTM)$648M$1M$2.25B
Net Income (TTM)$115M$-36M$41M
Gross Margin58.5%66.0%64.6%
Operating Margin15.5%-24.4%1.5%
Forward P/E16.1x109.7x
Total Debt$13M$6M$1.43B
Cash & Equiv.$155M$2M$960M

OPRA vs MNTS vs IACLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OPRA
MNTS
IAC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Opera Limited (OPRA)100303.6+203.6%
Momentus Inc. (MNTS)1000.1-99.9%
IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC)10089.3-10.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: OPRA leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Momentus Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OPRA
Opera Limited
The Growth Leader

OPRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.

  • 28.3% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
  • Lower P/E (16.1x vs 109.7x)
  • 17.7% margin vs MNTS's -34.5%
Best for: growth and value
MNTS
Momentus Inc.
The Growth Play

MNTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth -31.6%, EPS growth 90.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 85.7%
  • +153.4% vs OPRA's +15.1%
Best for: growth exposure
IAC
IAC InterActive Corp.
The Income Pick

IAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.10
  • 347.8% 10Y total return vs OPRA's 70.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 29.8%, current ratio 2.75x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOPRA logoOPRA28.3% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
ValueOPRA logoOPRALower P/E (16.1x vs 109.7x)
Quality / MarginsOPRA logoOPRA17.7% margin vs MNTS's -34.5%
Stability / SafetyIAC logoIACBeta 1.10 vs MNTS's 3.48
DividendsOPRA logoOPRA4.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MNTS logoMNTS+153.4% vs OPRA's +15.1%
Efficiency (ROA)OPRA logoOPRA10.4% ROA vs MNTS's -281.8%, ROIC 8.2% vs -7.3%

OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OPRAOpera Limited
FY 2025
Advertising [member]
100.0%$396M
MNTSMomentus Inc.
FY 2023
Transportation Services
100.0%$2M
IACIAC InterActive Corp.
FY 2025
People Inc.
73.6%$1.8B
Care.com
14.5%$347M
Search
8.9%$213M
Emerging & Other
3.0%$71M
Intersegment Eliminations
-0.0%$-145,000

OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOPRALAGGINGMNTS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

OPRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

IAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 2176.0x MNTS's $1M. OPRA is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNTS's -34.5%. On growth, MNTS holds the edge at +118.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedMNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$648M$1M$2.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$120M-$24M$129M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$115M-$36M$41M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$129M-$18M$60M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.5%+66.0%+64.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.5%-24.4%+1.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.7%-34.5%+1.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.9%-17.9%+2.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.2%+118.7%-25.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.0%-140.0%+64.8%
OPRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OPRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, OPRA's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IAC's 14.3x.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedMNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
Market CapShares × price$1.7B$3M$3.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$7M$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.76x-0.11x-32.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.06x109.69x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.78x14.30x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.72x1.26x1.34x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.69x0.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.58x71.54x
OPRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

OPRA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

OPRA delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $1 for IAC. OPRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IAC's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRA scores 6/9 vs MNTS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedMNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.8%+0.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+10.4%-2.8%+0.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.2%-7.3%-1.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.4%-13.2%-1.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9635
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$143M$4M$466M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$155M$2M$960M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13M$6M$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense222.21x-54.08x4.84x
OPRA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

OPRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in OPRA five years ago would be worth $21,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for MNTS. Over the past 12 months, MNTS leads with a +153.4% total return vs OPRA's +15.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPRA at 19.7% vs MNTS's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedMNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+37.5%-23.2%+10.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+15.1%+153.4%+22.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+71.3%-98.4%-2.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.8%-99.9%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.1%-99.9%+347.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.7%-74.9%-1.0%
OPRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

IAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

IAC is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTS's 3.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAC currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs MNTS's 27.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedMNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.57x3.48x1.10x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.06$15.98$45.78
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.71$0.44$29.56
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.1%+27.6%+94.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.648.148.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded623K1.8M1.1M
IAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: OPRA as "Buy", IAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.6% upside for OPRA (target: $22) vs 14.0% for IAC (target: $49). OPRA is the only dividend payer here at 4.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedMNTS logoMNTSMomentus Inc.IAC logoIACIAC InterActive C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.50$49.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts733
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+9.8%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

OPRA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IAC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallOpera Limited (OPRA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OPRA or MNTS or IAC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Opera Limited (OPRA) is the stronger pick with 28.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Opera Limited (OPRA) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Opera Limited (OPRA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?

On forward P/E, Opera Limited is actually cheaper at 16.

1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?

Over the past 5 years, Opera Limited (OPRA) delivered a total return of +110.

8%, compared to -99. 9% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +347. 8% versus MNTS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IAC InterActive Corp.

(IAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Momentus Inc. 's 3. 48β — meaning MNTS is approximately 217% more volatile than IAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opera Limited (OPRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for IAC InterActive Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Opera Limited (OPRA) is pulling ahead at 28.

3% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Momentus Inc. grew EPS 90. 0% year-over-year, compared to 32. 2% for Opera Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTS leads at 85. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?

Opera Limited (OPRA) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

6% net margin versus -1653. 1% for Momentus Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPRA leads at 15. 0% versus -1404. 1% for MNTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTS leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OPRA or MNTS or IAC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Opera Limited (OPRA) trades at 16.

1x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 93. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRA: 14. 6% to $21. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?

In this comparison, OPRA (4.

2% yield) pays a dividend. MNTS, IAC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is OPRA or MNTS or IAC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, IAC InterActive Corp.

(IAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), +347. 8% 10Y return). Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a higher beta of 3. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IAC: +347. 8%, MNTS: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OPRA and MNTS and IAC?

These companies operate in different sectors (OPRA (Communication Services) and MNTS (Industrials) and IAC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: OPRA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OPRA pays a dividend while MNTS, IAC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OPRA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNTS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 59%
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IAC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OPRA and MNTS and IAC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OPRA: 23.2% · MNTS: 118.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.