Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Internet Content & Information
OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Aerospace & Defense | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.68B | $3M | $3.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $648M | $1M | $2.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $115M | $-36M | $41M |
| Gross Margin | 58.5% | 66.0% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | -24.4% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 16.1x | — | 109.7x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $6M | $1.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $155M | $2M | $960M |
OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | 100 | 303.6 | +203.6% |
| Momentus Inc. (MNTS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 89.3 | -10.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 28.3% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
- Lower P/E (16.1x vs 109.7x)
- 17.7% margin vs MNTS's -34.5%
MNTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -31.6%, EPS growth 90.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 85.7%
- +153.4% vs OPRA's +15.1%
IAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.10
- 347.8% 10Y total return vs OPRA's 70.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 29.8%, current ratio 2.75x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.3% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.1x vs 109.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs MNTS's -34.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs MNTS's 3.48 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +153.4% vs OPRA's +15.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.4% ROA vs MNTS's -281.8%, ROIC 8.2% vs -7.3% |
OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 2176.0x MNTS's $1M. OPRA is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNTS's -34.5%. On growth, MNTS holds the edge at +118.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $648M | $1M | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $120M | -$24M | $129M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $115M | -$36M | $41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $129M | -$18M | $60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.5% | +66.0% | +64.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | -24.4% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | -34.5% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | -17.9% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.2% | +118.7% | -25.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.0% | -140.0% | +64.8% |
Valuation Metrics
OPRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OPRA's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IAC's 14.3x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $3M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $7M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.76x | -0.11x | -32.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.06x | — | 109.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.78x | — | 14.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.72x | 1.26x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.69x | — | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.58x | — | 71.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OPRA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OPRA delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $1 for IAC. OPRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IAC's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRA scores 6/9 vs MNTS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | — | +0.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.4% | -2.8% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | -7.3% | -1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | -13.2% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$143M | $4M | $466M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $155M | $2M | $960M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $6M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 222.21x | -54.08x | 4.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OPRA five years ago would be worth $21,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for MNTS. Over the past 12 months, MNTS leads with a +153.4% total return vs OPRA's +15.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPRA at 19.7% vs MNTS's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.5% | -23.2% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.1% | +153.4% | +22.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.3% | -98.4% | -2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.8% | -99.9% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.1% | -99.9% | +347.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.7% | -74.9% | -1.0% |
Risk & Volatility
IAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IAC is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTS's 3.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAC currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs MNTS's 27.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 3.48x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.06 | $15.98 | $45.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.71 | $0.44 | $29.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.1% | +27.6% | +94.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.6 | 48.1 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 623K | 1.8M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPRA as "Buy", IAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.6% upside for OPRA (target: $22) vs 14.0% for IAC (target: $49). OPRA is the only dividend payer here at 4.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.50 | — | $49.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +9.8% |
OPRA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IAC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
OPRA vs MNTS vs IAC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPRA or MNTS or IAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Opera Limited (OPRA) is the stronger pick with 28.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Opera Limited (OPRA) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Opera Limited (OPRA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?
On forward P/E, Opera Limited is actually cheaper at 16.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?
Over the past 5 years, Opera Limited (OPRA) delivered a total return of +110.
8%, compared to -99. 9% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +347. 8% versus MNTS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IAC InterActive Corp.
(IAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Momentus Inc. 's 3. 48β — meaning MNTS is approximately 217% more volatile than IAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opera Limited (OPRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for IAC InterActive Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Opera Limited (OPRA) is pulling ahead at 28.
3% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Momentus Inc. grew EPS 90. 0% year-over-year, compared to 32. 2% for Opera Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTS leads at 85. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?
Opera Limited (OPRA) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
6% net margin versus -1653. 1% for Momentus Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPRA leads at 15. 0% versus -1404. 1% for MNTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTS leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPRA or MNTS or IAC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Opera Limited (OPRA) trades at 16.
1x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 93. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRA: 14. 6% to $21. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPRA or MNTS or IAC?
In this comparison, OPRA (4.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MNTS, IAC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OPRA or MNTS or IAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IAC InterActive Corp.
(IAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), +347. 8% 10Y return). Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a higher beta of 3. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IAC: +347. 8%, MNTS: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPRA and MNTS and IAC?
These companies operate in different sectors (OPRA (Communication Services) and MNTS (Industrials) and IAC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OPRA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OPRA pays a dividend while MNTS, IAC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.