Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MNTS vs RDW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
MNTS vs RDW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $3M | $10.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $335M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-36M | $-227M |
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | 5.2% |
| Operating Margin | -24.4% | -68.5% |
| Total Debt | $6M | $44M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $95M |
MNTS vs RDW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Momentus Inc. (MNTS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Redwire Corporation (RDW) | 100 | 82.6 | -17.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNTS vs RDW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -31.6%, EPS growth 90.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 85.7%
- +152.1% vs RDW's -24.2%
RDW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 3.20
- -16.7% 10Y total return vs MNTS's -99.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.20, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 1.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs MNTS's -31.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -67.6% margin vs MNTS's -34.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 3.20 vs MNTS's 3.48 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +152.1% vs RDW's -24.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -15.6% ROA vs MNTS's -281.8%, ROIC -32.7% vs -7.3% |
MNTS vs RDW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MNTS vs RDW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDW is the larger business by revenue, generating $335M annually — 325.0x MNTS's $1M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -67.6% (RDW) to -34.5% (MNTS). On growth, MNTS holds the edge at +118.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $335M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | -$209M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$36M | -$227M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | -$165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.0% | +5.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.4% | -68.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -34.5% | -67.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.9% | -49.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +118.7% | +56.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -140.0% | +64.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNTS and RDW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $10.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.12x | -3.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 30.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 9.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RDW leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RDW scores 4/9 vs MNTS's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.8% | -15.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.3% | -32.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.2% | -32.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$51M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $44M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -54.08x | -2.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RDW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RDW five years ago would be worth $8,640 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for MNTS. Over the past 12 months, MNTS leads with a +152.1% total return vs RDW's -24.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RDW at 43.8% vs MNTS's -74.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.4% | -3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +152.1% | -24.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | +197.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -13.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -16.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.5% | +43.8% |
Risk & Volatility
RDW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RDW is the less volatile stock with a 3.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTS's 3.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RDW currently trades 39.0% from its 52-week high vs MNTS's 29.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.48x | 3.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.98 | $22.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.44 | $4.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.7% | +39.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 43.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 19.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
RDW leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
MNTS vs RDW: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNTS or RDW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Redwire Corporation (RDW) is the stronger pick with 10.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 6% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Analysts rate Redwire Corporation (RDW) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MNTS or RDW?
Over the past 5 years, Redwire Corporation (RDW) delivered a total return of -13.
6%, compared to -99. 9% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RDW returned -16. 7% versus MNTS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MNTS or RDW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Redwire Corporation (RDW) is the lower-risk stock at 3.
20β versus Momentus Inc. 's 3. 48β — meaning MNTS is approximately 9% more volatile than RDW relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MNTS or RDW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Redwire Corporation (RDW) is pulling ahead at 10.
3% versus -31. 6% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Momentus Inc. grew EPS 90. 0% year-over-year, compared to 3. 0% for Redwire Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTS leads at 85. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MNTS or RDW?
Redwire Corporation (RDW) is the more profitable company, earning -67.
6% net margin versus -1653. 1% for Momentus Inc. — meaning it keeps -67. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RDW leads at -68. 5% versus -1404. 1% for MNTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTS leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MNTS or RDW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MNTS or RDW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Redwire Corporation (RDW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a higher beta of 3. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RDW: -16. 7%, MNTS: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MNTS and RDW?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.