ORA vs CWEN

For growth investors, Ormat Technologies, Inc.

(ORA) is the stronger pick with 12. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Clearway Energy, Inc.

(CWEN) is the cheapest at 27. 1x versus Ormat Technologies, Inc. at 56. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, Clearway Energy, Inc.

(CWEN) delivered a total return of +69. 5%, compared to +67. 5% for Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWEN returned +223. 7% versus ORA's +177. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clearway Energy, Inc.

(CWEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Ormat Technologies, Inc. 's 0. 77β — meaning ORA is approximately 43% more volatile than CWEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 106% versus 172% for Clearway Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ormat Technologies, Inc.

(ORA) is pulling ahead at 12. 5% versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearway Energy, Inc. grew EPS 89. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1. 0% for Ormat Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORA leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Ormat Technologies, Inc.

(ORA) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus 11. 8% for Clearway Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORA leads at 18. 5% versus 12. 3% for CWEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORA leads at 27. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ORA: 14.

8% to $132. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) offers the highest yield at 7. 8%, versus 0. 4% for Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Clearway Energy, Inc.

(CWEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 7. 8% yield, +223. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWEN: +223. 7%, ORA: +177. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ORA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CWEN pays a dividend while ORA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.