OSK vs CNH

For growth investors, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) is the stronger pick with -2.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) is the cheapest at 15.

6x versus CNH Industrial N. V. at 26. 4x. On forward P/E, Oshkosh Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) delivered a total return of +25.

0%, compared to -24. 9% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OSK returned +267. 9% versus CNH's +81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CNH Industrial N.

V. (CNH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Oshkosh Corporation's 1. 49β — meaning OSK is approximately 29% more volatile than CNH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) is pulling ahead at -2.

9% versus -8. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oshkosh Corporation grew EPS -3. 5% year-over-year, compared to -58. 6% for CNH Industrial N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSK leads at 11. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

2% net margin versus 2. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNH leads at 15. 4% versus 9. 1% for OSK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNH leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) trades at 14.

0x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for CNH Industrial N. V. — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNH: 22. 5% to $13. 25.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 2% for Oshkosh Corporation (OSK).

For long-horizon retirement investors, CNH Industrial N.

V. (CNH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNH: +81. 4%, OSK: +267. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OSK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CNH pays a dividend while OSK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.