OST
Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OST vs LIQT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Market Cap$22M
5Y Perf.-83.2%
OST vs LIQT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OST | LIQT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls |
| Market Cap | $10M | $22M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $72M | $17M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | 5.9% | 4.9% |
| Operating Margin | -25.8% | -50.0% |
| Total Debt | $26M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | — |
OST vs LIQT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OST
LIQT
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ostin Technology Gr… (OST) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 16.8 | -83.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OST vs LIQT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OST leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. LiqTech International, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OST
Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd.
The Income Pick
OST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.05
- Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth 97.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, current ratio 0.46x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
LIQT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -90.9% 10Y total return vs OST's -100.0%
- +64.8% vs OST's -98.2%
- -29.5% ROA vs OST's -38.5%, ROIC -31.1% vs -19.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OST | 22.2% revenue growth vs LIQT's 13.0% |
| Quality / Margins | OST | -27.8% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% |
| Stability / Safety | OST | Beta 0.05 vs LIQT's 0.52 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LIQT | +64.8% vs OST's -98.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LIQT | -29.5% ROA vs OST's -38.5%, ROIC -31.1% vs -19.2% |
OST vs LIQT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
OST vs LIQT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOSTLAGGINGLIQT
LIQTLiqTech International…
2leads
OSTOstin Technology Grou…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LIQTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
OST5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OST2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LIQT5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LIQT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OST is the larger business by revenue, generating $72M annually — 4.3x LIQT's $17M. OST is the more profitable business, keeping -27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OSTOstin Technology … | LIQTLiqTech Internati… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $72M | $17M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +4.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -25.8% | -50.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.8% | -53.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.2% | -39.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | +53.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.5% | +69.4% |
OST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OST leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | OSTOstin Technology … | LIQTLiqTech Internati… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $22M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $34M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | -2.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | 2.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
OST leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIQT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIQT delivers a -70.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-70 in annual profit, vs $-2 for OST. LIQT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OST's 2.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OST scores 5/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OSTOstin Technology … | LIQTLiqTech Internati… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -70.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.5% | -29.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.2% | -31.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -76.8% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.34x | 1.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | — |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.80x | -13.46x |
LIQT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIQT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIQT five years ago would be worth $391 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for OST. Over the past 12 months, LIQT leads with a +64.8% total return vs OST's -98.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIQT at -11.8% vs OST's -82.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OSTOstin Technology … | LIQTLiqTech Internati… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +54.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.2% | +64.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -31.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -96.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -90.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -82.1% | -11.8% |
LIQT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OST and LIQT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OST is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIQT's 0.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIQT currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs OST's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OSTOstin Technology … | LIQTLiqTech Internati… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $235.00 | $3.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.35 | $1.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.7% | +68.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 5.5 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44K | 50K |
Evenly matched — OST and LIQT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | OSTOstin Technology … | LIQTLiqTech Internati… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
OST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LIQT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallOstin Technology Group Co.,… (OST)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OST vs LIQT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OST or LIQT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ostin Technology Group Co.
, Ltd. (OST) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 0% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OST or LIQT?
Over the past 5 years, LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) delivered a total return of -96. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Ostin Technology Group Co. , Ltd. (OST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIQT returned -90. 9% versus OST's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OST or LIQT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ostin Technology Group Co.
, Ltd. (OST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus LiqTech International, Inc. 's 0. 52β — meaning LIQT is approximately 944% more volatile than OST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 117% versus 2% for Ostin Technology Group Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OST or LIQT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ostin Technology Group Co.
, Ltd. (OST) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus 13. 0% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ostin Technology Group Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 97. 4% year-over-year, compared to 45. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIQT leads at 1. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OST or LIQT?
Ostin Technology Group Co.
, Ltd. (OST) is the more profitable company, earning -25. 2% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps -25. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OST leads at -22. 9% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIQT leads at 7. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OST or LIQT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is OST or LIQT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ostin Technology Group Co.
, Ltd. (OST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OST: -100. 0%, LIQT: -90. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OST and LIQT?
These companies operate in different sectors (OST (Technology) and LIQT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OST is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OST: 7.7% · LIQT: 53.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.