Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PACK vs SON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
PACK vs SON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $557M | $5.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $405M | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $1.04B |
| Gross Margin | 24.4% | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | -5.0% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $430M | $4.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $378M |
PACK vs SON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranpak Holdings Cor… (PACK) | 100 | 86.9 | -13.1% |
| Sonoco Products Com… (SON) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PACK vs SON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PACK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.70, Low D/E 80.4%, current ratio 1.83x
- +94.3% vs SON's +20.4%
SON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.1%
- Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 141.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 49.4% 10Y total return vs PACK's -32.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.7% revenue growth vs PACK's 7.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs PACK's -9.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs PACK's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield; 30-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.3% vs SON's +20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs PACK's -3.3%, ROIC 6.2% vs -2.0% |
PACK vs SON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PACK vs SON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SON is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 18.5x PACK's $405M. SON is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PACK's -9.3%. On growth, PACK holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $405M | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $266M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +20.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +13.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | +23.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PACK and SON each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SON's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PACK's 21.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $557M | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $924M | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.47x | 12.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.91x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.79x | 7.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SON leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SON delivers a 30.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PACK. PACK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SON's 1.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SON scores 7/9 vs PACK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.0% | +30.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 1.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $367M | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $378M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $430M | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.64x | 4.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PACK and SON each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SON five years ago would be worth $9,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,342 for PACK. Over the past 12 months, PACK leads with a +94.3% total return vs SON's +20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PACK at 30.2% vs SON's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.7% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.3% | +20.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.7% | -2.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.6% | -10.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.0% | +49.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.2% | -0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PACK and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SON is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PACK's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PACK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs SON's 88.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.70x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.67 | $58.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.02 | $38.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +88.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.7 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 630K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PACK as "Buy" and SON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.1% upside for PACK (target: $9) vs 14.4% for SON (target: $59). SON is the only dividend payer here at 4.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.38 | $59.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
SON leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
PACK vs SON: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PACK or SON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Sonoco Products Company (SON) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PACK or SON?
Over the past 5 years, Sonoco Products Company (SON) delivered a total return of -10.
0%, compared to -66. 6% for Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SON returned +49. 4% versus PACK's -32. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PACK or SON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus Ranpak Holdings Corp. 's 2. 70β — meaning PACK is approximately 409% more volatile than SON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 134% for Sonoco Products Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PACK or SON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.
7% versus 7. 1% for Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonoco Products Company grew EPS 141. 2% year-over-year, compared to -73. 1% for Ranpak Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PACK or SON?
Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
3% net margin versus -9. 7% for Ranpak Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SON leads at 9. 5% versus -6. 2% for PACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PACK leads at 24. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PACK or SON more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PACK: 44.
1% to $9. 38.
07Which pays a better dividend — PACK or SON?
In this comparison, SON (4.
1% yield) pays a dividend. PACK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PACK or SON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 4. 1% yield). Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SON: +49. 4%, PACK: -32. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PACK and SON?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PACK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock. SON pays a dividend while PACK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.