Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PACK vs SON

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PACK
Ranpak Holdings Corp.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$557M
5Y Perf.-13.1%
SON
Sonoco Products Company

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.09B
5Y Perf.-0.5%

PACK vs SON — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PACK logoPACK
SON logoSON
IndustryPackaging & ContainersPackaging & Containers
Market Cap$557M$5.09B
Revenue (TTM)$405M$7.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-38M$1.04B
Gross Margin24.4%20.9%
Operating Margin-5.0%8.7%
Forward P/E8.9x
Total Debt$430M$4.85B
Cash & Equiv.$63M$378M

PACK vs SONLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PACK
SON
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ranpak Holdings Cor… (PACK)10086.9-13.1%
Sonoco Products Com… (SON)10099.5-0.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PACK vs SON

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SON leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Ranpak Holdings Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PACK
Ranpak Holdings Corp.
The Defensive Pick

PACK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.70, Low D/E 80.4%, current ratio 1.83x
  • +94.3% vs SON's +20.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
SON
Sonoco Products Company
The Income Pick

SON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.1%
  • Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 141.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
  • 49.4% 10Y total return vs PACK's -32.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSON logoSON41.7% revenue growth vs PACK's 7.1%
Quality / MarginsSON logoSON13.8% margin vs PACK's -9.3%
Stability / SafetySON logoSONBeta 0.53 vs PACK's 2.70
DividendsSON logoSON4.1% yield; 30-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PACK logoPACK+94.3% vs SON's +20.4%
Efficiency (ROA)SON logoSON9.0% ROA vs PACK's -3.3%, ROIC 6.2% vs -2.0%

PACK vs SON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PACKRanpak Holdings Corp.
FY 2023
Paper
78.6%$264M
Machine Lease
15.3%$52M
Product and Service, Other
6.1%$21M
SONSonoco Products Company
FY 2025
Consumer Packaging
66.9%$4.9B
Industrial Paper Packaging Segment
33.1%$2.4B

PACK vs SON — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSONLAGGINGPACK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SON is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 18.5x PACK's $405M. SON is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PACK's -9.3%. On growth, PACK holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPACK logoPACKRanpak Holdings C…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$405M$7.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$48M$1.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$38M$1.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4M$266M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.4%+20.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-5.0%+8.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-9.3%+13.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.9%+3.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.0%-1.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.7%+23.6%
SON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PACK and SON each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, SON's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PACK's 21.8x.

MetricPACK logoPACKRanpak Holdings C…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
Market CapShares × price$557M$5.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$924M$9.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-14.47x12.95x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.86x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.91x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.79x7.76x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.41x0.68x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.02x1.41x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.95x
Evenly matched — PACK and SON each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SON leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SON delivers a 30.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PACK. PACK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SON's 1.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SON scores 7/9 vs PACK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPACK logoPACKRanpak Holdings C…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-7.0%+30.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.3%+9.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.0%+6.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.3%+8.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.80x1.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$367M$4.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$63M$378M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$430M$4.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.64x4.60x
SON leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — PACK and SON each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SON five years ago would be worth $9,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,342 for PACK. Over the past 12 months, PACK leads with a +94.3% total return vs SON's +20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PACK at 30.2% vs SON's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPACK logoPACKRanpak Holdings C…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.7%+18.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+94.3%+20.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+120.7%-2.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.6%-10.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.0%+49.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.2%-0.8%
Evenly matched — PACK and SON each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PACK and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SON is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PACK's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PACK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs SON's 88.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPACK logoPACKRanpak Holdings C…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.70x0.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.67$58.43
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.02$38.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.6%+88.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10081.748.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded630K1.1M
Evenly matched — PACK and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates PACK as "Buy" and SON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.1% upside for PACK (target: $9) vs 14.4% for SON (target: $59). SON is the only dividend payer here at 4.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPACK logoPACKRanpak Holdings C…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.38$59.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts521
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises30
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.09
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

SON leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallSonoco Products Company (SON)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PACK vs SON: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PACK or SON a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Sonoco Products Company (SON) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — PACK or SON?

Over the past 5 years, Sonoco Products Company (SON) delivered a total return of -10.

0%, compared to -66. 6% for Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SON returned +49. 4% versus PACK's -32. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — PACK or SON?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

53β versus Ranpak Holdings Corp. 's 2. 70β — meaning PACK is approximately 409% more volatile than SON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 134% for Sonoco Products Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — PACK or SON?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.

7% versus 7. 1% for Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonoco Products Company grew EPS 141. 2% year-over-year, compared to -73. 1% for Ranpak Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — PACK or SON?

Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

3% net margin versus -9. 7% for Ranpak Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SON leads at 9. 5% versus -6. 2% for PACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PACK leads at 24. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is PACK or SON more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PACK: 44.

1% to $9. 38.

07

Which pays a better dividend — PACK or SON?

In this comparison, SON (4.

1% yield) pays a dividend. PACK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is PACK or SON better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

53), 4. 1% yield). Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SON: +49. 4%, PACK: -32. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between PACK and SON?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PACK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock. SON pays a dividend while PACK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

PACK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SON

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PACK and SON on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PACK: 11.0% · SON: -1.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.