Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PACK vs SEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
PACK vs SEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $557M | $6.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $405M | $5.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $506M |
| Gross Margin | 24.4% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | -5.0% | 13.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $430M | $4.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $344M |
PACK vs SEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranpak Holdings Cor… (PACK) | 100 | 86.9 | -13.1% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PACK vs SEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PACK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth -73.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.70, Low D/E 80.4%, current ratio 1.83x
- 7.1% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6%
SEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 1.9%
- 4.4% 10Y total return vs PACK's -32.0%
- Beta 0.31, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.91x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs PACK's -9.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs PACK's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.3% vs SEE's +39.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs PACK's -3.3%, ROIC 11.2% vs -2.0% |
PACK vs SEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PACK vs SEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEE is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 13.2x PACK's $405M. SEE is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PACK's -9.3%. On growth, PACK holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $405M | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $965M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $506M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $459M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +29.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | +13.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +8.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | +16.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PACK and SEE each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SEE's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PACK's 21.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $557M | $6.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $924M | $10.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.47x | 12.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.79x | 14.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PACK. PACK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEE scores 5/9 vs PACK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.0% | +48.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 3.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $367M | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $344M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $430M | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.64x | 1.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PACK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SEE five years ago would be worth $8,122 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,342 for PACK. Over the past 12 months, PACK leads with a +94.3% total return vs SEE's +39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PACK at 30.2% vs SEE's 0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.7% | +2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.3% | +39.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.7% | +2.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.6% | -18.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.0% | +4.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.2% | +0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PACK and SEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PACK's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.70x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.67 | $44.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.02 | $28.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.7 | 64.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 630K | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PACK as "Buy" and SEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.1% upside for PACK (target: $9) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). SEE is the only dividend payer here at 1.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.38 | $43.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SEE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PACK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PACK vs SEE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PACK or SEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ranpak Holdings Corp.
(PACK) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PACK or SEE?
Over the past 5 years, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) delivered a total return of -18.
8%, compared to -66. 6% for Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEE returned +4. 4% versus PACK's -32. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PACK or SEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
31β versus Ranpak Holdings Corp. 's 2. 70β — meaning PACK is approximately 761% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PACK or SEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ranpak Holdings Corp.
(PACK) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sealed Air Corporation grew EPS 89. 5% year-over-year, compared to -73. 1% for Ranpak Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PACK leads at 6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PACK or SEE?
Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
4% net margin versus -9. 7% for Ranpak Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus -6. 2% for PACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PACK or SEE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PACK: 44.
1% to $9. 38.
07Which pays a better dividend — PACK or SEE?
In this comparison, SEE (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. PACK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PACK or SEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
31), 1. 9% yield). Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, PACK: -32. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PACK and SEE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PACK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock. SEE pays a dividend while PACK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.