PAVS
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
Packaged Foods
Market Cap$70K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PAVS vs TAOP vs GFAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TAOP
Taoping Inc.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited
Security & Protection Services
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-99.5%
PAVS vs TAOP vs GFAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PAVS | TAOP | GFAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Software - Infrastructure | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $70K | $1M | $10M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $36M | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $-7M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 11.1% | 14.9% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | -10.3% | -15.7% | -27.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $10M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $261K | $2M | $22M |
PAVS vs TAOP vs GFAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PAVS
TAOP
GFAI
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paranovus Entertain… (PAVS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Taoping Inc. (TAOP) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAVS vs TAOP vs GFAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TAOP and GFAI are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Guardforce AI Co., Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PAVS
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
The Defensive Pick
PAVS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 8.1%, current ratio 1.12x
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 1.12x
- Beta 1.51 vs GFAI's 2.31, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
TAOP
Taoping Inc.
The Income Pick
TAOP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.30
- -19.6% margin vs PAVS's -211.2%
- -21.7% ROA vs PAVS's -94.4%, ROIC -27.1% vs -27.1%
Best for: income & stability
GFAI
Guardforce AI Co., Limited
The Growth Play
GFAI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.2%, EPS growth 88.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
- -99.5% 10Y total return vs TAOP's -99.9%
- 0.2% revenue growth vs PAVS's -98.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GFAI | 0.2% revenue growth vs PAVS's -98.9% |
| Quality / Margins | TAOP | -19.6% margin vs PAVS's -211.2% |
| Stability / Safety | PAVS | Beta 1.51 vs GFAI's 2.31, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GFAI | -53.2% vs PAVS's -99.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TAOP | -21.7% ROA vs PAVS's -94.4%, ROIC -27.1% vs -27.1% |
PAVS vs TAOP vs GFAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
PAVS vs TAOP vs GFAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPAVSLAGGINGGFAI
Who Leads Where
PAVS leads in 2 of 6 categories
GFAI leads 1 • TAOP leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓GFAIGuardforce AI Co., Li…
1leads
TAOPTaoping Inc.
1leads
PAVSParanovus Entertainme…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TAOPvs GFAIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PAVS3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PAVS4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GFAI5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TAOP1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAVS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GFAI is the larger business by revenue, generating $72M annually — 5.7x PAVS's $13M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -19.6% (TAOP) to -2.1% (PAVS). On growth, PAVS holds the edge at +180.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $36M | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $531,773 | -$4M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | -$7M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$3M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +14.9% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | -15.7% | -27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -19.6% | -32.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.5% | -8.1% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +180.3% | -2.6% | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.9% | -51.7% | +38.9% |
PAVS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PAVS and TAOP and GFAI each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70,061 | $1M | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $9M | -$9M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -0.16x | -0.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.00x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.98x | 0.04x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.08x | 0.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Evenly matched — PAVS and TAOP and GFAI each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAVS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TAOP delivers a -46.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-47 in annual profit, vs $-116 for PAVS. PAVS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TAOP's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs TAOP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -116.2% | -46.7% | -69.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -94.4% | -21.7% | -50.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | -27.1% | -41.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.5% | -38.0% | -19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.50x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $8M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $261,355 | $2M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $10M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.83x | -52.63x | -167.24x |
PAVS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GFAI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GFAI five years ago would be worth $46 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for PAVS. Over the past 12 months, GFAI leads with a -53.2% total return vs PAVS's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GFAI at -60.4% vs PAVS's -93.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -94.8% | -6.8% | -26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -78.3% | -53.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.3% | -93.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.9% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.9% | -99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.2% | -80.9% | -60.4% |
GFAI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PAVS and GFAI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAVS is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GFAI currently trades 31.5% from its 52-week high vs PAVS's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 2.30x | 2.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1488.00 | $20.10 | $1.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.02 | $1.18 | $0.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +6.4% | +31.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.9 | 53.1 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 20K | 378K |
Evenly matched — PAVS and GFAI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TAOP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. | GFAIGuardforce AI Co.… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TAOP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
PAVS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GFAI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallParanovus Entertainment Tec… (PAVS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PAVS vs TAOP vs GFAI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAVS or TAOP or GFAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Guardforce AI Co.
, Limited (GFAI) is the stronger pick with 0. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 9% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PAVS or TAOP or GFAI?
Over the past 5 years, Guardforce AI Co.
, Limited (GFAI) delivered a total return of -99. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GFAI returned -99. 5% versus PAVS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PAVS or TAOP or GFAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
(PAVS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 31β — meaning GFAI is approximately 53% more volatile than PAVS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 50% for Taoping Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PAVS or TAOP or GFAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Guardforce AI Co.
, Limited (GFAI) is pulling ahead at 0. 2% versus -98. 9% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. grew EPS 96. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1870. 0% for Taoping Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TAOP leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PAVS or TAOP or GFAI?
Guardforce AI Co.
, Limited (GFAI) is the more profitable company, earning -16. 1% net margin versus -110. 3% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. — meaning it keeps -16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GFAI leads at -18. 5% versus -94. 8% for PAVS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GFAI leads at 17. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PAVS or TAOP or GFAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PAVS or TAOP or GFAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
(PAVS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Taoping Inc. (TAOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAVS: -100. 0%, TAOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PAVS and TAOP and GFAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (PAVS (Consumer Defensive) and TAOP (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PAVS: 18033.4% · TAOP: -2.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.