PCG vs SRE

For growth investors, Sempra (SRE) is the stronger pick with 5.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for PG&E Corporation (PCG). PG&E Corporation (PCG) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PG&E Corporation (PCG) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, PG&E Corporation (PCG) is the cheapest at 13.

7x versus Sempra at 29. 5x. On forward P/E, PG&E Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Sempra (SRE) delivered a total return of +54.

7%, compared to +50. 0% for PG&E Corporation (PCG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SRE returned +119. 2% versus PCG's -67. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sempra (SRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

37β versus PG&E Corporation's 0. 45β — meaning PCG is approximately 20% more volatile than SRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sempra (SRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 83% versus 187% for PG&E Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sempra (SRE) is pulling ahead at 5.

7% versus 2. 1% for PG&E Corporation (PCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PG&E Corporation grew EPS 2. 6% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Sempra. Over a 3-year CAGR, PCG leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Sempra (SRE) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

1% net margin versus 10. 8% for PG&E Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PCG leads at 19. 6% versus 15. 9% for SRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SRE leads at 52. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, PG&E Corporation (PCG) trades at 9.

8x forward P/E versus 18. 3x for Sempra — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCG: 42. 2% to $23. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Sempra (SRE) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 0. 6% for PG&E Corporation (PCG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sempra (SRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

37), 2. 6% yield, +119. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRE: +119. 2%, PCG: -67. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PCG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SRE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.