Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PEPG vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
PEPG vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $127M | $2.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-90M | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -83.9% |
| Total Debt | $17M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $434M |
PEPG vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PepGen Inc. (PEPG) | 100 | 16.5 | -83.5% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 55.3 | -44.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEPG vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEPG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.17
- EPS growth 25.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 11.94x
RARE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -58.9% 10Y total return vs PEPG's -85.7%
- 20.1% revenue growth vs PEPG's -1.0%
- -45.8% ROA vs PEPG's -60.4%, ROIC -89.4% vs -73.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs PEPG's -1.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs RARE's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.0% vs RARE's -26.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -45.8% ROA vs PEPG's -60.4%, ROIC -89.4% vs -73.2% |
PEPG vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PEPG vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PEPG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and PEPG operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$90M | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$90M | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$82M | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.3% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
RARE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $127M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.87x | -4.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PEPG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PEPG delivers a -75.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-76 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -75.7% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.4% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -73.2% | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.4% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44M | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RARE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RARE five years ago would be worth $2,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,431 for PEPG. Over the past 12 months, PEPG leads with a +43.0% total return vs RARE's -26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RARE at -18.0% vs PEPG's -50.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -74.3% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.0% | -26.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | -44.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.7% | -77.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.7% | -58.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.2% | -18.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PEPG and RARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PEPG is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RARE currently trades 61.2% from its 52-week high vs PEPG's 23.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.80 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.7% | +61.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PEPG as "Buy" and RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 279.4% upside for PEPG (target: $7) vs 98.6% for RARE (target: $52).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $51.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PEPG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RARE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
PEPG vs RARE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEPG or RARE a better buy right now?
Analysts rate PepGen Inc.
(PEPG) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PEPG or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) delivered a total return of -77. 6%, compared to -85. 7% for PepGen Inc. (PEPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RARE returned -58. 9% versus PEPG's -85. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PEPG or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PepGen Inc.
(PEPG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 720% more volatile than PEPG relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — PEPG or RARE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PepGen Inc.
grew EPS 25. 6% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PEPG or RARE?
PepGen Inc.
(PEPG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PEPG leads at 0. 0% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RARE leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PEPG or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PEPG or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PepGen Inc.
(PEPG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PEPG: -85. 7%, RARE: -58. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PEPG and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PEPG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.