PHI vs TKC

For growth investors, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.

S. (TKC) is the stronger pick with 55. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for PLDT Inc. (PHI). PLDT Inc. (PHI) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, PLDT Inc.

(PHI) is the cheapest at 8. 8x versus Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. at 11. 0x. On forward P/E, PLDT Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. wins at 0. 00x versus PLDT Inc. 's 0. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.

S. (TKC) delivered a total return of +62. 3%, compared to +11. 1% for PLDT Inc. (PHI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PHI returned +6. 9% versus TKC's -0. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PLDT Inc.

(PHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. 's 0. 60β — meaning TKC is approximately 186% more volatile than PHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 3% for PLDT Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.

S. (TKC) is pulling ahead at 55. 6% versus 3. 0% for PLDT Inc. (PHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. grew EPS 87. 6% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for PLDT Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKC leads at 15. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.

S. (TKC) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 1% net margin versus 13. 7% for PLDT Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHI leads at 24. 9% versus 21. 1% for TKC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PHI leads at 59. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus PLDT Inc. 's 0. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PLDT Inc. (PHI) trades at 0. 1x forward P/E versus 0. 2x for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

PLDT Inc. (PHI) offers the highest yield at 7. 8%, versus 2. 8% for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, PLDT Inc.

(PHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 7. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PHI: +6. 9%, TKC: -0. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PHI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TKC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.