REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
PINE vs NNN vs ADC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
PINE vs NNN vs ADC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $281M | $8.47B | $9.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $65M | $936M | $750M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-415K | $387M | $220M |
| Gross Margin | -4.1% | 81.4% | 87.6% |
| Operating Margin | 28.0% | 63.3% | 48.0% |
| Forward P/E | 59.3x | 21.7x | 38.9x |
| Total Debt | $394M | $4.82B | $3.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $5M | $16M |
PINE vs NNN vs ADC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 158.8 | +58.8% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
| Agree Realty Corpor… (ADC) | 100 | 121.6 | +21.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PINE vs NNN vs ADC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +37.3% vs ADC's +4.3%
NNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 5.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, current ratio 0.19x
- Beta 0.15, yield 5.3%, current ratio 0.19x
ADC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth -0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.7%
- 135.6% 10Y total return vs PINE's 38.3%
- 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 38.9x), PEG 1.94 vs 113.70 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs PINE's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs PINE's 0.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs ADC's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs ADC's +4.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 4.8% vs 2.2% |
PINE vs NNN vs ADC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PINE vs NNN vs ADC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN is the larger business by revenue, generating $936M annually — 14.5x PINE's $65M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -0.6%. On growth, PINE holds the edge at +29.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $65M | $936M | $750M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $867M | $638M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$415,000 | $387M | $220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$46M | $464M | $110M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +81.4% | +87.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.0% | +63.3% | +48.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +41.4% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -71.7% | +49.6% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.6% | +4.1% | +18.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +185.7% | -2.0% | +19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, NNN trades at a 50% valuation discount to ADC's 43.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NNN offers better value at 1.93x vs ADC's 113.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $281M | $8.5B | $9.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $671M | $13.3B | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -89.27x | 21.50x | 43.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 59.32x | 21.69x | 38.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.93x | 113.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.63x | 15.85x | 20.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.65x | 9.14x | 12.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 1.90x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.69x | 18.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-0 for PINE. ADC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PINE's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADC scores 5/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +8.8% | +3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +4.1% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +4.8% | +2.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +6.4% | +3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | 1.09x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $390M | $4.8B | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $5M | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $394M | $4.8B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | 2.93x | 2.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINE five years ago would be worth $14,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,498 for NNN. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +37.3% total return vs ADC's +4.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 13.6% vs NNN's 4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.8% | +15.6% | +7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.3% | +12.4% | +4.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.6% | +15.1% | +26.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.2% | +15.0% | +29.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.3% | +37.8% | +135.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.6% | +4.8% | +8.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNN and ADC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADC is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PINE's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs ADC's 93.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.15x | -0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.80 | $46.03 | $82.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.10 | $38.90 | $69.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.4% | +96.7% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 58.4 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 176K | 1.5M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
NNN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PINE as "Buy", NNN as "Hold", ADC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for ADC (target: $84) vs 3.5% for NNN (target: $46). For income investors, NNN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.30% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.75 | $46.06 | $83.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 29 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +5.3% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $2.36 | $3.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
NNN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PINE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
PINE vs NNN vs ADC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PINE or NNN or ADC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PINE or NNN or ADC?
On trailing P/E, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus Agree Realty Corporation at 43. 1x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NNN REIT, Inc. wins at 1. 94x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PINE or NNN or ADC?
Over the past 5 years, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
(PINE) delivered a total return of +41. 2%, compared to +15. 0% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADC returned +135. 6% versus NNN's +37. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PINE or NNN or ADC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning PINE is approximately -339% more volatile than ADC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 131% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PINE or NNN or ADC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agree Realty Corporation grew EPS -0. 6% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ADC leads at 18. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PINE or NNN or ADC?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus 30. 5% for PINE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADC leads at 87. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PINE or NNN or ADC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 94x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 37. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADC: 9. 4% to $83. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PINE or NNN or ADC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 0. 2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
09Is PINE or NNN or ADC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14), 4. 0% yield, +135. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADC: +135. 6%, PINE: +38. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PINE and NNN and ADC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ADC is a small-cap high-growth stock. NNN, ADC pay a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.