Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $383M | $2.52B | $272M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $146M | $902M | $120M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $169M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 73.6% | 70.3% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 24.3% | 27.2% |
| Forward P/E | 535.7x | 11.5x | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $143M | $327M | $115M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $157M | $185M | $132M |
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) | 100 | 237.2 | +137.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PKBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 39.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 44.2%, current ratio 0.09x
- NIM 3.4% vs NBTB's 3.1%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 361.3% 10Y total return vs PKBK's 286.6%
- PEG 0.74 vs NBTB's 1.64
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.74 vs 1.64
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% NII/revenue growth vs FUNC's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.74 vs 1.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs NBTB's 0.76 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.1% vs NBTB's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PKBK leads in 2 of 6 categories
FUNC leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PKBK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 7.5x FUNC's $120M. PKBK is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NBTB's 18.8%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $146M | $902M | $120M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $241M | $35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $169M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $225M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.3% | +73.6% | +70.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +24.3% | +27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +18.8% | +20.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +24.9% | +13.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | +39.5% | +20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PKBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, PKBK trades at a 30% valuation discount to NBTB's 14.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 0.85x vs NBTB's 2.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $383M | $2.5B | $272M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $370M | $2.7B | $255M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.17x | 14.47x | 11.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 535.67x | 11.54x | 9.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.72x | 2.06x | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.34x | 11.03x | 7.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.62x | 2.90x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 1.29x | 1.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.84x | 11.49x | 17.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PKBK and NBTB and FUNC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PKBK scores 8/9 vs FUNC's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +9.5% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +7.9% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +2.4% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.17x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $142M | -$17M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $157M | $185M | $132M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143M | $327M | $115M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 1.05x | 0.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,438 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, PKBK leads with a +67.1% total return vs NBTB's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs NBTB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.0% | +17.6% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.1% | +18.3% | +44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.0% | +48.5% | +192.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.1% | +44.4% | +141.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +286.6% | +108.5% | +361.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +14.1% | +43.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PKBK and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PKBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.76x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.24 | $48.27 | $42.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.78 | $39.20 | $28.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +99.8% | +98.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 63.1 | 71.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 266K | 13K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -4.5% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs FUNC's 2.19%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +3.0% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $1.43 | $0.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
PKBK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FUNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PKBK vs NBTB vs FUNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PKBK or NBTB or FUNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for First United Corporation (FUNC). Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (535. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC?
On trailing P/E, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 14. 5x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 74x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.
9%, compared to +44. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +361. 3% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NBTB is approximately 21% more volatile than PKBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 56% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus 6. 6% for First United Corporation (FUNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Parke Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 39. 2% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC?
Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 9% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PKBK leads at 34. 2% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PKBK or NBTB or FUNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 535. 7x for Parke Bancorp, Inc. — 526. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: -4. 5% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PKBK or NBTB or FUNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 2% for First United Corporation (FUNC).
09Is PKBK or NBTB or FUNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 2. 2% yield, +361. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +361. 3%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PKBK and NBTB and FUNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.