PNFP vs SFNC

For growth investors, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

(PNFP) is the stronger pick with 15. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 9. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

(PNFP) delivered a total return of +18. 0%, compared to -14. 9% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PNFP returned +127. 8% versus SFNC's +26. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

02β versus Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning PNFP is approximately 9% more volatile than SFNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 39% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

(PNFP) is pulling ahead at 15. 3% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. grew EPS -16. 5% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

(PNFP) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 6% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PNFP leads at 20. 4% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PNFP leads at 49. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

(PNFP) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 5x for Simmons First National Corporation — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNFP: 18. 0% to $117. 63.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 9% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

02), 4. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SFNC: +26. 4%, PNFP: +127. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PNFP is a small-cap high-growth stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.