Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
R vs GATX vs AL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
R vs GATX vs AL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $9.48B | $6.96B | $7.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.66B | $1.70B | $3.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $495M | $313M | $1.09B |
| Gross Margin | 26.0% | 48.8% | 38.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 30.6% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 16.5x | 19.5x | 12.8x |
| Total Debt | $8.68B | $8.41B | $19.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $198M | $402M | $466M |
R vs GATX vs AL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryder System, Inc. (R) | 100 | 705.1 | +605.1% |
| GATX Corporation (GATX) | 100 | 312.3 | +212.3% |
| Air Lease Corporati… (AL) | 100 | 215.7 | +115.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: R vs GATX vs AL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
R has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 1.4%
- 1.4% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs GATX's 1.2%
- +70.4% vs GATX's +34.3%
GATX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 9.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 389.6% 10Y total return vs R's 291.7%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs R's 0.2%
AL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, current ratio 0.93x
- PEG 0.79 vs GATX's 0.88
- Beta 0.30, yield 1.3%, current ratio 0.93x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs R's 0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 19.5x), PEG 0.79 vs 0.88 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.1% margin vs R's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs R's 1.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs GATX's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.4% vs GATX's +34.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs GATX's 2.4%, ROIC 7.0% vs 3.6% |
R vs GATX vs AL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
R vs GATX vs AL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
R is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.7B annually — 7.4x GATX's $1.7B. AL is the more profitable business, keeping 36.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to R's 3.9%. On growth, AL holds the edge at +15.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.7B | $1.7B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $966M | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $495M | $313M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $478M | -$532M | -$1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +48.8% | +38.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +30.6% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +18.3% | +36.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | -31.2% | -57.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | +8.4% | +15.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | -7.8% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.0x trailing earnings, AL trades at a 72% valuation discount to GATX's 25.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AL offers better value at 0.43x vs GATX's 1.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.5B | $7.0B | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.0B | $15.0B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.05x | 25.08x | 7.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.48x | 19.48x | 12.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.14x | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.40x | 16.72x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 4.39x | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.29x | 2.87x | 0.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.65x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
R leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
R delivers a 39.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $12 for GATX. AL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GATX's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), R scores 9/9 vs GATX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +39.5% | +11.5% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +2.4% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +3.6% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +4.1% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.84x | 3.45x | 2.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.5B | $8.0B | $19.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $198M | $402M | $466M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.7B | $8.4B | $19.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.13x | 0.85x | 6.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
R leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in R five years ago would be worth $29,681 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,210 for AL. Over the past 12 months, R leads with a +70.4% total return vs GATX's +34.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors R at 44.5% vs GATX's 21.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.3% | +14.6% | +1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.4% | +34.3% | +35.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +201.5% | +77.4% | +78.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.8% | +105.9% | +42.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +291.7% | +389.6% | +136.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.5% | +21.1% | +21.3% |
Risk & Volatility
AL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AL is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than R's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs R's 93.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 0.71x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $258.49 | $205.56 | $65.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $139.77 | $143.46 | $47.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.0% | +94.9% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 55.1 | 66.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 373K | 183K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
R leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: R as "Buy", GATX as "Buy", AL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.6% upside for GATX (target: $212) vs 0.0% for AL (target: $65). For income investors, R offers the higher dividend yield at 1.44% vs GATX's 1.21%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $247.33 | $212.00 | $65.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 14 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 18 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.47 | $2.36 | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
AL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). R leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
R vs GATX vs AL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is R or GATX or AL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GATX Corporation (GATX) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Ryder System, Inc. (R). Air Lease Corporation (AL) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ryder System, Inc. (R) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — R or GATX or AL?
On trailing P/E, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the cheapest at 7.
0x versus GATX Corporation at 25. 1x. On forward P/E, Air Lease Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Air Lease Corporation wins at 0. 79x versus GATX Corporation's 0. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — R or GATX or AL?
Over the past 5 years, Ryder System, Inc.
(R) delivered a total return of +196. 8%, compared to +42. 1% for Air Lease Corporation (AL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GATX returned +389. 6% versus AL's +136. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — R or GATX or AL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus Ryder System, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning R is approximately 369% more volatile than AL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Air Lease Corporation (AL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for GATX Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — R or GATX or AL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GATX Corporation (GATX) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus 0. 2% for Ryder System, Inc. (R). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Air Lease Corporation grew EPS 179. 0% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for Ryder System, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AL leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — R or GATX or AL?
Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 3. 9% for Ryder System, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AL leads at 50. 5% versus 8. 6% for R. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AL leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is R or GATX or AL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus GATX Corporation's 0. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Air Lease Corporation (AL) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for GATX Corporation — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GATX: 8. 6% to $212. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — R or GATX or AL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ryder System, Inc. (R) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 1. 2% for GATX Corporation (GATX).
09Is R or GATX or AL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
30), 1. 3% yield, +136. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AL: +136. 6%, R: +291. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between R and GATX and AL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: R is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GATX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.