Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RCMT vs KELYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
RCMT vs KELYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $213M | $345M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $319M | $4.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $-254M |
| Gross Margin | 27.2% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | -1.6% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $33M |
RCMT vs KELYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCM Technologies, I… (RCMT) | 100 | 2239.6 | +2139.6% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 65.3 | -34.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RCMT vs KELYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RCMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.7%, EPS growth 28.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 494.1% 10Y total return vs KELYA's -33.2%
- 14.7% revenue growth vs KELYA's -1.9%
KELYA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 1.01, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% revenue growth vs KELYA's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.1x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs KELYA's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs RCMT's 1.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.3% vs KELYA's -12.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 26.9% vs -4.0% |
RCMT vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RCMT vs KELYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KELYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 13.3x RCMT's $319M. RCMT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -6.0%. On growth, RCMT holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $319M | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $27M | -$27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | -$254M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $114M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.2% | +20.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | -1.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | -6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | -11.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.2% | -3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $213M | $345M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $236M | $471M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.96x | -1.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.96x | 11.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.36x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.97x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.25x | 3.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT delivers a 40.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-26 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCMT's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCMT scores 8/9 vs KELYA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +40.9% | -26.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.5% | -11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.9% | -4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +31.6% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | $126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.05x | -5.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCMT five years ago would be worth $88,265 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,202 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, RCMT leads with a +74.3% total return vs KELYA's -12.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCMT at 35.0% vs KELYA's -12.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +51.1% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.3% | -12.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.8% | -33.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +782.6% | -58.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +494.1% | -33.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.0% | -12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCMT and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KELYA is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCMT's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCMT currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs KELYA's 65.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.50 | $14.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.05 | $7.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +65.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.6 | 65.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 66K | 352K |
Analyst Outlook
KELYA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RCMT as "Buy" and KELYA as "Buy". KELYA is the only dividend payer here at 3.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | +3.6% |
RCMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KELYA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
RCMT vs KELYA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RCMT or KELYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RCMT or KELYA?
On forward P/E, Kelly Services, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RCMT or KELYA?
Over the past 5 years, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) delivered a total return of +782. 6%, compared to -58. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCMT returned +494. 1% versus KELYA's -33. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RCMT or KELYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus RCM Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning RCMT is approximately 28% more volatile than KELYA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 56% for RCM Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RCMT or KELYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus -1. 9% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCM Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 28. 0% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCMT leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RCMT or KELYA?
RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 1% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCMT leads at 7. 9% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCMT leads at 26. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RCMT or KELYA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) trades at 11. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for RCM Technologies, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — RCMT or KELYA?
In this comparison, KELYA (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. RCMT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RCMT or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KELYA: -33. 2%, RCMT: +494. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RCMT and KELYA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RCMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KELYA pays a dividend while RCMT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.