Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
REVG vs WNC vs OSUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
REVG vs WNC vs OSUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $3.12B | $316M | $216M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.40B | $1.47B | $85M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $108M | $-65M | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 14.4% | 2.0% | 38.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | -3.1% | -58.6% |
| Forward P/E | 17.2x | 1.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $56M | $443M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $32M | $199K |
REVG vs WNC vs OSUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| REV Group, Inc. (REVG) | 100 | 1047.5 | +947.5% |
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| OraSure Technologie… (OSUR) | 100 | 19.2 | -80.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REVG vs WNC vs OSUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
REVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.9%
- 174.2% 10Y total return vs WNC's -22.3%
WNC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Better valuation composite
- 4.2% yield, vs REVG's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
OSUR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 6.58x
- Beta 1.45, current ratio 6.58x
- Beta 1.45 vs WNC's 1.93, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs OSUR's -38.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.5% margin vs OSUR's -61.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.45 vs WNC's 1.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs REVG's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.2% vs WNC's -0.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs OSUR's -16.6%, ROIC 29.9% vs -20.0% |
REVG vs WNC vs OSUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
REVG vs WNC vs OSUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REVG is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 28.2x OSUR's $85M. REVG is the more profitable business, keeping 4.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OSUR's -61.9%. On growth, REVG holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $1.5B | $85M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | -$2M | -$45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $108M | -$65M | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $200M | -$38M | -$33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +2.0% | +38.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -3.1% | -58.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -4.4% | -61.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | -2.6% | -38.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | -20.4% | -99.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +68.6% | -120.7% | -52.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WNC and OSUR each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 95% valuation discount to REVG's 33.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WNC's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REVG's 14.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $316M | $216M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $727M | $229M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.81x | 1.53x | -3.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.18x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.35x | 1.91x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 0.20x | 1.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.73x | 0.88x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.41x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
REVG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REVG delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-19 for OSUR. OSUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WNC's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REVG scores 7/9 vs OSUR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.9% | -17.3% | -19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | -5.0% | -16.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.9% | +37.4% | -20.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.0% | +32.6% | -16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 1.20x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | $411M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $32M | $199,278 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $443M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.03x | -0.97x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REVG five years ago would be worth $37,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,083 for OSUR. Over the past 12 months, REVG leads with a +80.2% total return vs WNC's -0.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REVG at 85.2% vs WNC's -28.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | -11.3% | +26.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.2% | -0.5% | +7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +535.6% | -64.0% | -57.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +271.2% | -47.9% | -69.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.2% | -22.3% | -54.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +85.2% | -28.9% | -24.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — REVG and OSUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OSUR is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNC's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REVG currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs WNC's 60.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.93x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.92 | $12.94 | $3.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.74 | $7.10 | $2.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +60.0% | +78.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 34.2 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 594K | 455K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WNC and OSUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REVG as "Hold", WNC as "Hold", OSUR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 125.2% upside for WNC (target: $18) vs -13.9% for REVG (target: $55). For income investors, WNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.25% vs REVG's 0.40%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.00 | $17.50 | $4.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 18 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +4.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $0.33 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | +10.7% | +7.0% |
REVG leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
REVG vs WNC vs OSUR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REVG or WNC or OSUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) is the stronger pick with 3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -38. 1% for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate REV Group, Inc. (REVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REVG or WNC or OSUR?
On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus REV Group, Inc. at 33. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REVG or WNC or OSUR?
Over the past 5 years, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) delivered a total return of +271. 2%, compared to -69. 2% for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REVG returned +174. 2% versus OSUR's -54. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REVG or WNC or OSUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OraSure Technologies, Inc.
(OSUR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 45β versus Wabash National Corporation's 1. 93β — meaning WNC is approximately 33% more volatile than OSUR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 120% for Wabash National Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — REVG or WNC or OSUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) is pulling ahead at 3. 5% versus -38. 1% for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -261. 5% for OraSure Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REVG leads at 1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — REVG or WNC or OSUR?
Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
7% net margin versus -59. 8% for OraSure Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WNC leads at 20. 8% versus -59. 2% for OSUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OSUR leads at 41. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is REVG or WNC or OSUR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WNC: 125.
2% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — REVG or WNC or OSUR?
In this comparison, WNC (4.
2% yield), REVG (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. OSUR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is REVG or WNC or OSUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+174. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (REVG: +174. 2%, OSUR: -54. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between REVG and WNC and OSUR?
These companies operate in different sectors (REVG (Industrials) and WNC (Industrials) and OSUR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: REVG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; OSUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WNC pays a dividend while REVG, OSUR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.