Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
RRR vs BYD vs STN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Engineering & Construction
RRR vs BYD vs STN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $3.13B | $6.41B | $10.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.01B | $4.09B | $7.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $188M | $1.84B | $448M |
| Gross Margin | 59.8% | 42.1% | 42.3% |
| Operating Margin | 29.7% | 21.4% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.2x | 11.9x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $58M | $3.27B | $2.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $142M | $353M | $229M |
RRR vs BYD vs STN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Rock Resorts, I… (RRR) | 100 | 383.6 | +283.6% |
| Boyd Gaming Corpora… (BYD) | 100 | 398.3 | +298.3% |
| Stantec Inc. (STN) | 100 | 306.3 | +206.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RRR vs BYD vs STN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RRR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 17.5%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.98, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7%
BYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 0.8%
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 20.5x)
- 45.0% margin vs STN's 6.0%
STN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.7%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.9%
- 282.8% 10Y total return vs BYD's 373.2%
- 15.7% revenue growth vs RRR's 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.7% revenue growth vs RRR's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 20.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.0% margin vs STN's 6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs STN's 1.04 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.1% vs STN's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.9% ROA vs RRR's 4.6%, ROIC 12.3% vs 23.4% |
RRR vs BYD vs STN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RRR vs BYD vs STN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RRR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 3.7x RRR's $2.0B. BYD is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STN's 6.0%. On growth, STN holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $4.1B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $795M | $1.2B | $961M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $188M | $1.8B | $448M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $610M | $388M | $805M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.8% | +42.1% | +42.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +21.4% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +45.0% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +9.5% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +2.0% | +10.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | -6.8% | +46.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RRR and BYD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.8x trailing earnings, BYD trades at a 90% valuation discount to STN's 39.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RRR's 3.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STN's 17.7x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $6.4B | $10.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $9.3B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.96x | 3.77x | 39.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.18x | 11.87x | 20.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.10x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.83x | 7.91x | 17.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.56x | 1.57x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.34x | 2.67x | 4.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.84x | 16.51x | 28.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RRR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BYD delivers a 91.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $92 in annual profit, vs $14 for STN. RRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BYD's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RRR scores 7/9 vs BYD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +56.6% | +91.8% | +13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +27.9% | +5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.4% | +12.3% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.9% | +15.1% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 1.25x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$84M | $2.9B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $142M | $353M | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $3.3B | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.99x | 15.78x | 7.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STN five years ago would be worth $21,295 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,344 for BYD. Over the past 12 months, RRR leads with a +29.1% total return vs STN's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STN at 15.4% vs BYD's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | -1.0% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.1% | +24.3% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.5% | +24.1% | +53.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.7% | +33.4% | +113.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +248.2% | +373.2% | +282.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.6% | +7.5% | +15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STN's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYD currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs RRR's 76.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.86x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $68.99 | $89.96 | $114.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.16 | $68.98 | $84.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.7% | +94.7% | +80.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.2 | 47.1 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 956K | 935K | 257K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RRR and STN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RRR as "Buy", BYD as "Buy", STN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.0% upside for RRR (target: $71) vs -32.6% for STN (target: $62). For income investors, RRR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.22% vs STN's 0.66%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $71.44 | $95.00 | $62.07 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 38 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +0.8% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $0.71 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +12.1% | 0.0% |
RRR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RRR vs BYD vs STN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RRR or BYD or STN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stantec Inc.
(STN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR). Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the better valuation at 3. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RRR or BYD or STN?
On trailing P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the cheapest at 3.
8x versus Stantec Inc. at 39. 5x. On forward P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RRR or BYD or STN?
Over the past 5 years, Stantec Inc.
(STN) delivered a total return of +113. 0%, compared to +33. 4% for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BYD returned +373. 2% versus RRR's +248. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RRR or BYD or STN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus Stantec Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning STN is approximately 21% more volatile than BYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 125% for Boyd Gaming Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RRR or BYD or STN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stantec Inc.
(STN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus 3. 7% for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boyd Gaming Corporation grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to 6. 4% for Stantec Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STN leads at 17. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RRR or BYD or STN?
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
0% net margin versus 4. 8% for Stantec Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RRR leads at 29. 7% versus 7. 9% for STN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RRR or BYD or STN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) trades at 11.
9x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Stantec Inc. — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRR: 35. 0% to $71. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — RRR or BYD or STN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 0. 7% for Stantec Inc. (STN).
09Is RRR or BYD or STN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), 0. 8% yield, +373. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYD: +373. 2%, STN: +282. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RRR and BYD and STN?
These companies operate in different sectors (RRR (Consumer Cyclical) and BYD (Consumer Cyclical) and STN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RRR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BYD is a small-cap deep-value stock; STN is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.