SAZ vs SAR

For growth investors, Saratoga Investment Corp.

(SAR) is the stronger pick with 1334% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 35. 4% for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% (SAZ). Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Saratoga Investment Corp.

(SAR) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% at 12. 7x. On forward P/E, Saratoga Investment Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Saratoga Investment Corp.

(SAR) delivered a total return of +42. 5%, compared to +27. 1% for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% (SAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAR returned +183. 2% versus SAZ's +27. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Saratoga Investment Corp 8.

50% (SAZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Saratoga Investment Corp. 's 0. 60β — meaning SAR is approximately 15% more volatile than SAZ relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Saratoga Investment Corp.

(SAR) is pulling ahead at 1334% versus 35. 4% for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% (SAZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% grew EPS 184. 5% year-over-year, compared to 14. 4% for Saratoga Investment Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Saratoga Investment Corp 8.

50% (SAZ) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Saratoga Investment Corp. — meaning it keeps 29. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAZ leads at 33. 9% versus -0. 1% for SAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SAZ leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Saratoga Investment Corp.

(SAR) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 3x for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 11. 4% for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% (SAZ).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Saratoga Investment Corp.

(SAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 100. 0% yield, +183. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAR: +183. 2%, SAZ: +27. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.