SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$729M
5Y Perf.+579.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SB vs GNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+434.1%
SB vs GNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SB | GNK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $729M | $1.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $275M | $114.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $46M | $9.32B |
| Gross Margin | 36.9% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 11.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $537M | $200M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $84M | $56M |
SB vs GNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SB
GNK
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) | 100 | 679.9 | +579.9% |
| Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK) | 100 | 534.1 | +434.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SB vs GNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SB leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
The Income Pick
SB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.2%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs GNK's 329.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
The Income Angle
In this particular matchup, GNK is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SB | 8.2% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1% |
| Value | SB | Lower P/E (12.6x vs 14.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | SB | 16.8% margin vs GNK's 8.1% |
| Stability / Safety | SB | Beta 0.98 vs GNK's 1.00 |
| Dividends | SB | 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GNK's 3.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SB | +108.2% vs GNK's +96.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SB | 3.4% ROA vs GNK's 3.0%, ROIC 6.6% vs 0.7% |
SB vs GNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
SB vs GNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSBLAGGINGGNK
GNKGenco Shipping & Trad…
0leads
SBSafe Bulkers, Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GNKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SB4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SB6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SB5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SB2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SB and GNK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 417.6x SB's $275M. SB is the more profitable business, keeping 16.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNK's 8.1%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SBSafe Bulkers, Inc. | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $275M | $114.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $131M | $34.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $46M | $9.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $55M | $15.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.9% | +62.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +11.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +13.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +1604.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.8% | +175.0% |
Evenly matched — SB and GNK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SB's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.4x.
| Metric | SBSafe Bulkers, Inc. | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $729M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.34x | -255.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.61x | 14.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.95x | 14.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.37x | 3.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 1.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
SB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SB delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $4 for GNK. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SB's 0.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SB scores 7/9 vs GNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SBSafe Bulkers, Inc. | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $453M | $145M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $84M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $537M | $200M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.34x | 0.00x |
SB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GNK five years ago would be worth $19,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,671 for SB. Over the past 12 months, SB leads with a +108.2% total return vs GNK's +96.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SB at 27.1% vs GNK's 27.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SBSafe Bulkers, Inc. | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.3% | +41.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +108.2% | +96.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.5% | +105.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.7% | +99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +716.6% | +329.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.1% | +27.0% |
SB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SB and GNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SB is the less volatile stock with a 0.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GNK's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNK currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs SB's 96.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SBSafe Bulkers, Inc. | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.20 | $25.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.33 | $12.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 61.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 591K | 420K |
Evenly matched — SB and GNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SB as "Buy" and GNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -19.6% upside for GNK (target: $21) vs -39.3% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, SB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.96% vs GNK's 2.97%.
| Metric | SBSafe Bulkers, Inc. | GNKGenco Shipping & … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.20 | $20.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.27 | $0.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | 0.0% |
SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SB leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallSafe Bulkers, Inc. (SB)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SB vs GNK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SB or GNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the stronger pick with 8. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SB or GNK?
On forward P/E, Safe Bulkers, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 12. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SB or GNK?
Over the past 5 years, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) delivered a total return of +99.
4%, compared to +96. 7% for Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SB returned +765. 0% versus GNK's +401. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SB or GNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 98β versus Genco Shipping & Trading Limited's 1. 00β — meaning GNK is approximately 2% more volatile than SB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 65% for Safe Bulkers, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SB or GNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is pulling ahead at 8. 2% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SB leads at -2. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SB or GNK?
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus -1. 3% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SB leads at 36. 4% versus 2. 7% for GNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SB leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SB or GNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GNK: -19. 6% to $20. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SB or GNK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 3. 0% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK).
09Is SB or GNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Safe Bulkers, Inc.
(SB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98), 4. 0% yield, +765. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SB: +765. 0%, GNK: +401. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SB and GNK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SB is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SB: -3.7% · GNK: 160459.3%)Net Margin>
%
(SB: 16.8% · GNK: 8.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.