SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$10.29B
5Y Perf.+21.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SFD vs TSN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$24.24B
5Y Perf.+20.5%
SFD vs TSN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SFD | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $10.29B | $24.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.56B | $55.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.01B | $453M |
| Gross Margin | 13.4% | 6.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.40B | $8.83B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.54B | $1.23B |
SFD vs TSN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SFD
TSN
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smithfield Foods, I… (SFD) | 100 | 121.7 | +21.7% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 120.5 | +20.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFD vs TSN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SFD leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Tyson Foods, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
The Income Pick
SFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 18.0%
- 34.1% 10Y total return vs TSN's 25.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
The Momentum Pick
TSN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +25.8% vs SFD's +22.3%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SFD | 7.3% revenue growth vs TSN's 2.1% |
| Value | SFD | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 17.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | SFD | 6.5% margin vs TSN's 0.8% |
| Stability / Safety | SFD | Beta 0.30 vs TSN's 0.33, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SFD | 3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TSN's 2.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TSN | +25.8% vs SFD's +22.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SFD | 8.6% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 12.2% vs 4.1% |
SFD vs TSN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
SFD vs TSN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSFDLAGGINGTSN
TSNTyson Foods, Inc.
0leads
SFDSmithfield Foods, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TSNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SFD4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SFD4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SFD8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $55.7B annually — 3.6x SFD's $15.6B. SFD is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TSN's 0.8%. On growth, TSN holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.6B | $55.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $453M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $813M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +6.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.8% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | +36.1% |
SFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, SFD trades at a 79% valuation discount to TSN's 50.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SFD's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TSN's 11.4x.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.3B | $24.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.1B | $31.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.43x | 50.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.83x | 17.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.86x | 11.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.33x | 20.59x |
SFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFD leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFD delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $2 for TSN. SFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TSN's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSN scores 6/9 vs SFD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | +2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.2% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $857M | $7.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 34.71x | 2.73x |
SFD leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SFD and TSN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFD five years ago would be worth $13,413 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,915 for TSN. Over the past 12 months, TSN leads with a +25.8% total return vs SFD's +22.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSN at 13.4% vs SFD's 10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.6% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.3% | +25.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.1% | +45.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.1% | -0.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.1% | +25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.3% | +13.4% |
Evenly matched — SFD and TSN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFD and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSN's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs SFD's 87.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.80 | $69.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.08 | $50.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.8% | +98.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.2 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2.7M |
Evenly matched — SFD and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFD and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SFD as "Buy" and TSN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.3% upside for SFD (target: $32) vs 3.2% for TSN (target: $70). For income investors, SFD offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs TSN's 2.94%.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $70.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.01 | $2.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
Evenly matched — SFD and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SFD leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
Best OverallSmithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SFD vs TSN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFD or TSN a better buy right now?
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFD or TSN?
On trailing P/E, Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) is the cheapest at 10. 4x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 50. 1x. On forward P/E, Smithfield Foods, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFD or TSN?
Over the past 5 years, Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) delivered a total return of +34. 1%, compared to -0. 9% for Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFD returned +34. 1% versus TSN's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFD or TSN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Tyson Foods, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning TSN is approximately 10% more volatile than SFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 48% for Tyson Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — SFD or TSN?
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus 0. 9% for Tyson Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFD leads at 8. 3% versus 2. 6% for TSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFD leads at 13. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SFD or TSN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Tyson Foods, Inc. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SFD: 22. 3% to $32. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — SFD or TSN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 2. 9% for Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN).
08Is SFD or TSN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 3. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SFD: +34. 1%, TSN: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SFD and TSN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SFD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SFD: 0.8% · TSN: 4.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SFD: 10.4x · TSN: 50.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.