SFL
SFL Corporation Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$1.58B
5Y Perf.+20.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SFL vs TNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$2.83B
5Y Perf.+367.6%
SFL vs TNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SFL | TNK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.58B | $2.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $720M | $952M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $351M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.7% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 351.3x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.57B | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $151M | $831M |
SFL vs TNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SFL
TNK
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) | 100 | 120.1 | +20.1% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 467.6 | +367.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFL vs TNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TNK leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. SFL Corporation Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SFL
SFL Corporation Ltd.
The Income Pick
SFL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 7.9%
- Rev growth -19.3%, EPS growth -119.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- -19.3% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder
TNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 187.7% 10Y total return vs SFL's 56.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
- Beta 0.35, yield 2.4%, current ratio 7.98x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SFL | -19.3% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6% |
| Value | TNK | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 351.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | TNK | 36.9% margin vs SFL's -3.7% |
| Stability / Safety | TNK | Beta 0.35 vs SFL's 0.67, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SFL | 7.9% yield, vs TNK's 2.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TNK | +80.3% vs SFL's +55.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TNK | 15.7% ROA vs SFL's -0.7%, ROIC 12.5% vs 2.8% |
SFL vs TNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
SFL vs TNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTNKLAGGINGSFL
SFLSFL Corporation Ltd.
1leads
TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SFLMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TNK9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TNK6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SFL1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SFL and TNK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNK and SFL operate at a comparable scale, with $952M and $720M in trailing revenue. TNK is the more profitable business, keeping 36.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFL's -3.7%.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $720M | $952M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $414M | $348M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | $351M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $220M | $113M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +27.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +36.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.1% | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -123.3% | +46.0% |
Evenly matched — SFL and TNK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SFL and TNK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TNK's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SFL's 10.5x.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -59.55x | 8.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 351.33x | 6.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.52x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.65x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.20x | 25.09x |
Evenly matched — SFL and TNK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SFL. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFL's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TNK scores 4/9 vs SFL's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | +15.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.67x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | -$776M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $151M | $831M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $55M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | 109.95x |
TNK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,259 for SFL. Over the past 12 months, TNK leads with a +80.3% total return vs SFL's +55.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNK at 33.2% vs SFL's 18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +53.5% | +58.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.1% | +80.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.6% | +136.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.6% | +513.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.4% | +187.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | +33.2% |
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFL and TNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFL's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.96 | $83.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.73 | $41.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.8 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 542K |
Evenly matched — SFL and TNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SFL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SFL as "Hold" and TNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.7% upside for SFL (target: $15) vs 10.7% for TNK (target: $90). For income investors, SFL offers the higher dividend yield at 7.89% vs TNK's 2.44%.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $90.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.9% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.94 | $1.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% |
SFL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
TNK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SFL leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
Best OverallTeekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SFL vs TNK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFL or TNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SFL Corporation Ltd.
(SFL) is the stronger pick with -19. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFL or TNK?
On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 6. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFL or TNK?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +102. 6% for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TNK returned +187. 7% versus SFL's +56. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFL or TNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus SFL Corporation Ltd. 's 0. 67β — meaning SFL is approximately 91% more volatile than TNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for SFL Corporation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFL or TNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SFL Corporation Ltd.
(SFL) is pulling ahead at -19. 3% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -119. 8% for SFL Corporation Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SFL leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFL or TNK?
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus -3. 7% for SFL Corporation Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TNK leads at 22. 6% versus 19. 0% for SFL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFL leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SFL or TNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 351. 3x for SFL Corporation Ltd. — 345. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SFL: 21. 7% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SFL or TNK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) offers the highest yield at 7. 9%, versus 2. 4% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK).
09Is SFL or TNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 4% yield, +187. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TNK: +187. 7%, SFL: +56. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SFL and TNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (SFL (Industrials) and TNK (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SFL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SFL: -24.1% · TNK: -26.4%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.